John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 7. Nov. 2015 um 05:58 Uhr:

> >>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>
> > I've tried to review the discussion so far and believe the code is
> > "functional enough." I think we got agreement from Stefan (probably John
> > too) to exempt dynamic modules from the feature freeze.
>
> If Eli and Stefan agree,


Stefan disagreed with (a) error handling (longjmp vs. local return) and (b)
local object allocation (direct cast vs. a simple local allocator).


> you have my go ahead to integrate the code.


Would you prefer this as one big patch, or as several smaller ones? A big
patch would make it easier to see the code in context, but splitting it up
might increase review speed.