From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Philipp Stephani
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 20:33:08 +0200
Message-ID:
References: <20200801141014.51E78C21C82@raman-glaptop.localdomain>
<83wo2ictyz.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuxmctmo.fsf@gnu.org>
<20200801153823.GA55369@breton.holly.idiocy.org>
<83k0yicl01.fsf@gnu.org> <83ime2ckhb.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
logging-data="21035"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: Alan Third , Paul Eggert ,
raman , Emacs developers
To: Eli Zaretskii
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 01 20:34:14 2020
Return-path:
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from )
id 1k1wKj-0005KW-1n
for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:34:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from )
id 1k1wKi-00010Q-0V
for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:34:12 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41228)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from )
id 1k1wJv-0000GX-T6
for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:33:23 -0400
Original-Received: from mail-oo1-xc44.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c44]:42411)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from )
id 1k1wJu-0008GF-Ad; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:33:23 -0400
Original-Received: by mail-oo1-xc44.google.com with SMTP id k4so2146438ooa.9;
Sat, 01 Aug 2020 11:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=XqOQ/9wvb9brXyd2+O0d4hjmOPMKE3wCZAbB9HpkfTU=;
b=QeV1yVP+O4q6wpQF5/o7I4VBz97UK6JjrdYRZa9XIV24e1m1zkZFRosL/Ay/HQWqDH
3VgpyltVDbLK6/c1xEtFytT4kOZimv/8En+ycs64UlDGKoaD42hgA2eoTzw9ujPhhbEG
dn90MJj5Ws9kz0GI3VhcOS6s0zhVOd0KOZ1HpKibhmblOASBd8ZyvqQSGZbg8HwdPqMg
mZJsM38Y5LII4nkXcWCeXAJ5bKN/xFtQRnyk5bmTs+kg4jq5zHB2cAwpuE+pmclY8Vxm
xzJggQDV5EgJF0wQQ5dSWHKD1uxzKKzEK7I80zqC9FCSD4oKIszyivpMlkyED1+Ese64
1aEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=XqOQ/9wvb9brXyd2+O0d4hjmOPMKE3wCZAbB9HpkfTU=;
b=hMZFkw05K67Am2mQ04JfHHrni6+KtZvhg71cKTh9Fe1egPfb2FzchLd1+RyLhKziyf
lzIFjmGACfCf3Erkx7S6eQsdKYvMgDR3VF1e8Ca61I76Hr0LR52z7V/lA3Weewhaw9+W
ikQdUYSnSP+mRcGbXIF3hUaqNcB7SzwO7CwNZhjLbQ3ogctEjZ3O/W0rOIdzM8FRD0Id
ordbT09fRqWDgyxUnj67Dj4QJRrzqSMpfhBdornOIaHSIa54IfgVqXEMaH4NIfXOmOwk
F0UF1k0UzD4f/ybdOt5jBxnRPo2umHCzRCtUuvgZHFSGZF8We8THQgqyje/Q4ZqORKya
YWzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531b7tBWtdX7lIURrZCN25Qb9UkML+vSrcBl960Kh47tZcDELiCw
2cHa8BXUMg7URtFyYvmrjbVui+5Q+2nnjgwc2pLQyg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJFRI6pGsQ9M2zA5EXUMQy8DR3lED99gGoGQTuI9GZpSeueKRtXxPWPAZimEhp0IbWVYOc66MFpL0oOfIZ6Xs=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:3b0f:: with SMTP id s15mr8031779oos.71.1596306799974;
Sat, 01 Aug 2020 11:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <83ime2ckhb.fsf@gnu.org>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::c44;
envelope-from=p.stephani2@gmail.com; helo=mail-oo1-xc44.google.com
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache.
That's all we know.
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions."
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253390
Archived-At:
Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 20:03 Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii :
>
> > Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:51:42 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii
> > Cc: alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com,
> > raman@google.com
> >
> > 4641 | void *po = (char *) ((intptr_t) (char *) XLP (obj)
> > | ^
> >
> > This is a 32-bit build --with-wide-int, in case it matters, where
> > EMACS_INT is a 64-bit data type.
>
> Btw, I'm probably missing something, because I don't understand how
> XLP in its current definition can work in a --with-wide-int build,
> where the size of a Lisp_Object is wider than both intptr_t and a
> 'void *'.
This is somewhat subtle, but I think in this case it works because the
function bails out for the int types, and all other types are tagged
pointers.