From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 20:33:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200801141014.51E78C21C82@raman-glaptop.localdomain> <83wo2ictyz.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuxmctmo.fsf@gnu.org> <20200801153823.GA55369@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83k0yicl01.fsf@gnu.org> <83ime2ckhb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21035"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Alan Third , Paul Eggert , raman , Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 01 20:34:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k1wKj-0005KW-1n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:34:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1wKi-00010Q-0V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1wJv-0000GX-T6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:33:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oo1-xc44.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c44]:42411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1wJu-0008GF-Ad; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:33:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oo1-xc44.google.com with SMTP id k4so2146438ooa.9; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 11:33:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XqOQ/9wvb9brXyd2+O0d4hjmOPMKE3wCZAbB9HpkfTU=; b=QeV1yVP+O4q6wpQF5/o7I4VBz97UK6JjrdYRZa9XIV24e1m1zkZFRosL/Ay/HQWqDH 3VgpyltVDbLK6/c1xEtFytT4kOZimv/8En+ycs64UlDGKoaD42hgA2eoTzw9ujPhhbEG dn90MJj5Ws9kz0GI3VhcOS6s0zhVOd0KOZ1HpKibhmblOASBd8ZyvqQSGZbg8HwdPqMg mZJsM38Y5LII4nkXcWCeXAJ5bKN/xFtQRnyk5bmTs+kg4jq5zHB2cAwpuE+pmclY8Vxm xzJggQDV5EgJF0wQQ5dSWHKD1uxzKKzEK7I80zqC9FCSD4oKIszyivpMlkyED1+Ese64 1aEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XqOQ/9wvb9brXyd2+O0d4hjmOPMKE3wCZAbB9HpkfTU=; b=hMZFkw05K67Am2mQ04JfHHrni6+KtZvhg71cKTh9Fe1egPfb2FzchLd1+RyLhKziyf lzIFjmGACfCf3Erkx7S6eQsdKYvMgDR3VF1e8Ca61I76Hr0LR52z7V/lA3Weewhaw9+W ikQdUYSnSP+mRcGbXIF3hUaqNcB7SzwO7CwNZhjLbQ3ogctEjZ3O/W0rOIdzM8FRD0Id ordbT09fRqWDgyxUnj67Dj4QJRrzqSMpfhBdornOIaHSIa54IfgVqXEMaH4NIfXOmOwk F0UF1k0UzD4f/ybdOt5jBxnRPo2umHCzRCtUuvgZHFSGZF8We8THQgqyje/Q4ZqORKya YWzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531b7tBWtdX7lIURrZCN25Qb9UkML+vSrcBl960Kh47tZcDELiCw 2cHa8BXUMg7URtFyYvmrjbVui+5Q+2nnjgwc2pLQyg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJFRI6pGsQ9M2zA5EXUMQy8DR3lED99gGoGQTuI9GZpSeueKRtXxPWPAZimEhp0IbWVYOc66MFpL0oOfIZ6Xs= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:3b0f:: with SMTP id s15mr8031779oos.71.1596306799974; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 11:33:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ime2ckhb.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::c44; envelope-from=p.stephani2@gmail.com; helo=mail-oo1-xc44.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253390 Archived-At: Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 20:03 Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii : > > > Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:51:42 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > Cc: alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com, > > raman@google.com > > > > 4641 | void *po = (char *) ((intptr_t) (char *) XLP (obj) > > | ^ > > > > This is a 32-bit build --with-wide-int, in case it matters, where > > EMACS_INT is a 64-bit data type. > > Btw, I'm probably missing something, because I don't understand how > XLP in its current definition can work in a --with-wide-int build, > where the size of a Lisp_Object is wider than both intptr_t and a > 'void *'. This is somewhat subtle, but I think in this case it works because the function bails out for the int types, and all other types are tagged pointers.