From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 2b2fd39: xterm.el: Implement OSC-52 functionality for setting the X selection Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 06:35:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150413144903.4697.38336@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <2yvbguvize.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacb40e2a94cf05140e0609 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429425369 7786 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2015 06:36:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 06:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 19 08:36:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjipr-0007j1-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:36:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjipr-0005Tx-1W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjipc-0005Tp-Hg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:35:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjipb-0004h5-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:35:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:35247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjipZ-0004gr-OR; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so63889508wid.0; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:35:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/l45YWHZaoJjSbB+5UzN40pU9yLCebuCqDy6O0Y++G0=; b=0106NoYjm2+WJN+AbA0gLMEPTod8YQd94yItnKoscr/WR0WJ28e9YcF+aTISGExPRi CwBdjITUAVq3w1OVHYc8LFlig5eRfh7sRrrlg71vyvvvAqLxxgfgrGldDFeSe+jgzhBB s5MYGfTtho9uIz1ZoZRzG0Be6JMMXpHRy3eElyjEyErW/Z48Ltyuhbt1b5H9n9pSVWX5 2sk3NhHzE/MlZqio2le3PgrVegvDMLO+rHV1fdZCu4D7hpjgZKxrm0l7GpQIkRvg+iZS cpOcE1eg+XFl7qpTxceQtKDCWInUBidiZy62c/vNhWWltWsiDjESEWtMnxLNh4X8GBEr uteA== X-Received: by 10.194.60.4 with SMTP id d4mr20532811wjr.72.1429425349102; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 23:35:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185656 Archived-At: --047d7bacb40e2a94cf05140e0609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Stefan Monnier schrieb am So., 19. Apr. 2015 um 05:13 Uhr: > >> AFAIK this was all written by Google employees and is covered by > >> Google's blanket assignment. > > Ah right, I missed that. > > You're not alone: I forgot about it twice along the way. And it took me > a little while after your question to remember what was the answer. > > >> We don't have a good way to track/check it, tho. > > Indeed. I think I'm liable to forget this the next time it comes up. > > For me, it's not just "liable to". I know for a fact that I will > have forgotten (probably by next week or so). > > > A @gmail address doesn't make me think "employed by Google". > > Indeed, that person should also have (and should use) a @google.com > address. > Maybe recording the @google.com address would be a good first step to > try and keep track of this. > Please do use our @google.com addresses. I'm only using my private account for convenience reasons. If you want to validate the address send a quick mail there and I'll reply. --047d7bacb40e2a94cf05140e0609 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> sc= hrieb am So., 19. Apr. 2015 um 05:13=C2=A0Uhr:
>> AFAIK this was all written by Google employees and is covere= d by
>> Google's blanket assignment.
> Ah right, I missed that.

You're not alone: I forgot about it twice along the way.=C2=A0 And it t= ook me
a little while after your question to remember what was the answer.

>> We don't have a good way to track/check it, tho.
> Indeed.=C2=A0 I think I'm liable to forget this the next time it c= omes up.

For me, it's not just "liable to".=C2=A0 I know for a fact th= at I will
have forgotten (probably by next week or so).

> A @gmail address doesn't make me think "employed by Google&qu= ot;.

Indeed, that person should also have (and should use) a @google.com address.
Maybe recording the @google= .com address would be a good first step to
try and keep track of this.

Please do use our @google.com addresses. I'm only using my private account for = convenience reasons.
If you want to validate the address send a q= uick mail there and I'll reply.=C2=A0
--047d7bacb40e2a94cf05140e0609--