Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> schrieb am So., 20. Dez. 2015 um 19:59 Uhr:

> > From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:27:19 +0000
> > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, dancol@dancol.org, tzz@lifelogs.com,
> >       aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >
> >     and did you make sure
> >     that signaling an error from a module still reports the same
> >     information and backtrace as before the change?
> >
> > No, but I wouldn't know how the patch should change this. It only
> changes an
> > implementation detail in the error reporting code of the module
> implementation
> > itself.
>
> I provided one such test here:
>
>   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-11/msg02318.html
>
> and the resulting backtrace here:
>
>   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-11/msg02405.html
>
> > If we wanted to check the backtrace, I think we should rather add a unit
> test
> > for it.
>
> That would be good, thanks.
>
>
Added a patch to that effect.