Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> schrieb am Di., 1. März 2016 um 17:41 Uhr:

> On 02/29/2016 02:48 PM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
> > Could this patch please be reviewed and/or applied? Thanks.
>
> That was a long thread and I see multiple patches in it. Could you
> please summarize the current proposal as you see it? For reference:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-12/msg00871.html


I think this patch can still be applied as-is, it just simplifies the code
a bit without changing any behavior.


>
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-12/msg00881.html
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-12/msg00902.html
>
>
The second one is newer, so the first one should be discarded in favor of
the second one. Given the decision to allow longjmp on segfault, it is no
longer correct, but a variant (replacing "non-local exits" with "non-local
exits due to Lisp `signal' and `throw'") should still be correct and useful.