From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: i18n/l10n summary Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:52:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c0b16836fdab0550f49a62" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496386386 26832 195.159.176.226 (2 Jun 2017 06:53:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:53:06 +0000 (UTC) To: Paul Eggert , Jean-Christophe Helary , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 02 08:52:59 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dGgSA-0006aG-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 08:52:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48125 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dGgSF-0006IZ-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 02:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dGgS8-0006IS-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 02:52:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dGgS7-00068i-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 02:52:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]:33817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dGgS7-00066H-IZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 02:52:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id o65so56229607oif.1 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 23:52:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dsSdNSFEGkl7P28xik7IJBafYQPll2Qx2/Rdpf5rY1Y=; b=kRDrWvlMM/lDQ2neH5dr5tlfvldcsfG2/bD9EawI+4VM98UBINVAcjZBqbjixH/qlg z/KLIcgkfMke25QJjUqFK4G1ji5PkLQFtMSB3OuOCbxwZZvUtuK1lYG9qDv5U1tylnS3 8DAbzNCPbqFMCQ+oS55KJ1cJJrUGicmJ+KbMxAcOe7k42eAtl7J+nBrK5mfHfv3VbFdw BLUsDVv/x5KNkjDCuyxFUOuVOEMGr+KQg64moV69xodOfR28z3imKCKG3IIKwU/igRZJ ZLlyZ206eNOq74twZfy0r9GDbB/OBObyom4GB3nLhXlmJLFmbJL7whkgGpH0LZEfAd4V +EIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=dsSdNSFEGkl7P28xik7IJBafYQPll2Qx2/Rdpf5rY1Y=; b=BJaoyJELqHhlg1uRbF5iY7afhZXaWO0qaDJytnyzV8XZXaBqPUti+giGCzR1+hdPT9 yDOXXnGYaPNLHDQUMDWxSNzybEzc8/FgE/Ss9mUpi9ZbO5h5uIp+u5zm6TYrbAnA0IhD OHsP6W3sotRuQts+74Sdb0CfSYVZqHihizeT2CYStj01i6e4pxLHWB2QItF1Fr+mpPzm 3h4CQ3Oevje35eVtPfpKrJXEYTsGj7lnHS5eunGn9tNcq+3QSMntJBq5qZQrhVneriqM KGdEDrul1Sx3c/8LT6rozYDwkPuUPEPKxWIbsYk7pu+ovGzE3S9/UgwA0XlUTSZL2eHW IPOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOywcQ/pPZJ80SXCAL/TlY+S3MyzMHu5oumXHO/OAPQFM+bjDHeU PgzHxuOqRJOQPpXbL3meYW6OSvUS3A== X-Received: by 10.157.53.88 with SMTP id l24mr3409662ote.155.1496386373080; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 23:52:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215392 Archived-At: --001a11c0b16836fdab0550f49a62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul Eggert schrieb am Fr., 2. Juni 2017 um 01:20 Uhr: > On 06/01/2017 01:17 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote: > > > > - Probably there's a bug lurking because the info[n] ought to be > > indexed by specification index, not argument index. Something like > > (format "%1$c %1$d" ?a) will probably do the wrong thing (untested). > > Sorry, I'm not following. That call returns "a 97"; isn't that the > expected result? > Wrong example, try (format "%1$c %1$s" ?=C2=B1) > And on further thought, the tradition for Emacs is to > document supported behavior and not worry about slowing Emacs down to > check for undocumented usage Would be great to break that tradition, but that's for another discussion. --001a11c0b16836fdab0550f49a62 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Paul E= ggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> = schrieb am Fr., 2. Juni 2017 um 01:20=C2=A0Uhr:
On 06/01/2017 01:17 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
>
> - Probably there's a bug lurking because the info[n] ought to be > indexed by specification index, not argument index. Something like
> (format "%1$c %1$d" ?a) will probably do the wrong thing (un= tested).

Sorry, I'm not following. That call returns "a 97"; isn't= that the
expected result?

Wrong example, try (fo= rmat "%1$c %1$s" ?=C2=B1)
=C2=A0
And on further thought, the tradition for Emacs is to
document supported behavior and not worry about slowing Emacs down to
check for undocumented usage

Would be great= to break that tradition, but that's for another discussion.=C2=A0
--001a11c0b16836fdab0550f49a62--