Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> schrieb am Di., 24. Nov. 2015 um 20:32 Uhr:

> > From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:27:32 +0000
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >
> >     + (let ((descr (should-error (mod-test-sum 1 2 3))))
> >     + (should (eq (car descr) 'wrong-number-of-arguments))
> >
> >
> > I think testing using :type would also accept subtypes of the given
> type, which
> > I think would be preferrable (I'd expect that generally subtypes of the
> > documented signals are allowed to be thrown).
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you are saying.  Can you give an
> example?
>

If it is documented that an error of type X is thrown, does that mean the
error symbol is exactly X or rather that one of its conditions is X?