From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani
John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> skribis:
>>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> This is obviously the first patch of a series. It does not mak= e Emacs
>>> itself bit-reproducible, but it makes Emacs packages bit-repro= ducible.
>
>> I'd prefer to have the whole series, to see where this is goin= g, and then
>> commit them in one go. But that's me. John?
>
> Yes, I too would like to see this evolve on a feature branch until the= whole
> series is ready, after which Eli and I can review before moving into m= aster.
>
> How does that sound, Alex, Ludovic?
>From the Guix viewpoint, we need an immediate fix for this issue.=C2=A0 So<= br> we=E2=80=99ll be using the patch I posted until Emacs has an appropriate
solution, which may be along the lines of what Paul suggested.
We=E2=80=99ll surely look at making Emacs itself reproducible (and perhaps = the
Debian folks already have patches floating around), but no ETA.