Marcin Borkowski schrieb am Sa., 5. März 2016 um 16:40 Uhr: > > On 2016-03-05, at 16:28, Philipp Stephani wrote: > > > We should probably do whatever Perl does > > This is a slippery slope. > > (SCNR;-).) > > Best, > > Yes, and I certainly wouldn't introduce e.g. custom aliases (given the lack of reader macros such a change would be very unconventional). I'd vote for implementing "full" support and some of the aspects of "loose" support, as suggested by Paul.