From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to restore the layout? Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:32:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <51CC3E42.7020409@alice.it> <51CC4CC1.3030202@alice.it> <51CC8403.1030009@gmx.at> <51CCA56A.8000508@gmx.at> <51CCA7DC.8060605@gmx.at> <83fvw2g44j.fsf@gnu.org> <51CE9B05.1090202@gmx.at> <51CFFBED.7090400@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372588428 1629 80.91.229.3 (30 Jun 2013 10:33:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Angelo Graziosi , Emacs developers , Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , Stephen Berman , Jambunathan K To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 30 12:33:49 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UtEwz-0004Dk-OJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:33:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UtEwz-0004Hu-CR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 06:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UtEww-0004Ho-Jm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 06:33:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UtEwv-00068b-CC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 06:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22c]:52527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UtEwt-000680-5g; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 06:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c13so1520817eek.31 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 03:33:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=oiqkBlyS3tWYgQhVVye/lnx4YlbxQ8msjU3rXthEBa0=; b=ehOlDa12ihkftwphZ/RqJKKO6bMrYAQ+hKsVto9MQOQ/JYviYsSHgYcSNXtH6yxLkl tiaG7TA/kUFw5tK76O8kQGZH6qQLDIg/jIupFx1HKJjdCYcoVMiKxqON9ImHFrXqVR2z 3cFrLb3JJ6pVZ1SEPrBtNay0s/HYAgQJwlpmx3h5ESezia5UJJxwi8EZNJz3T+6jvsn0 5E5FN6/bxta2XgAot1wmc0rAYtM3awlpcxiJnypTg4PJXc+2GDpILB9SvlElp15TnGD2 yaS18S6gGDxxPH0hqKuLBj0e4Nt2xKb7bDMkqvNzwu9kFqZMDizan/wiCeU67q/U8int AOqg== X-Received: by 10.15.25.2 with SMTP id k2mr16574381eeu.99.1372588418185; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 03:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.14.142.4 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 03:32:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51CFFBED.7090400@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c00::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161340 Archived-At: On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:35 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > I think we already need at least two different configuration options, > one for the sizes/coordinates and one for the displays/monitors. That's > why I think that we shouldn't have `desktop-save-windows' handle the > monitor/display stuff itself. Just keep it boolean forever and any > remaining options can be added later on when we need them. Sorry, you lost me here. I proposed turning desktop-save-windows into a multi-valued custom, and you agreed. I suppose that means you changed your mind? Also, you proposed to rename the option to desktop-restore-frames, and/or do you propose now to reserve that name for the "display/monitors" option you're suggesting? I'm not arguing for/against anything, just trying to understand what is being suggested, exactly. J