From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Annoying (frameset bug?): desktop-mode and maxmized frame Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 18:47:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ob5srgmz.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjpcpe9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwlcp33l.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384105721 21426 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2013 17:48:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 10 18:48:47 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VfZ7t-00052h-Lk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 18:48:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32906 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfZ7t-0002Dm-7E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:48:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfZ7p-0002AV-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:48:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfZ7o-0001Rz-IQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:48:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22f]:51727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfZ7o-0001Rr-Ao for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:48:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c13so1955290eek.6 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:48:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=PIm8kKb97dbEYX+rlW4cd50PyMLpMyRmjt6Bz5W7sVI=; b=lhXs3BVtZV1OqDmZL54FseKP61juz/ED07dgF9nrRB6/at/flRwSt+OfND/HXex4gY bDGJ5DutMaarfCAF8mO3d4tzNYvKCFtDBZmqIfTRTTnNsZYEWSbUyr3oUTMb96GZt5vK 4siAPyuQvGMCW4Zv5e/SNHr6OCe7GaV6ILyH5t5b4hsBdmGXm9okfYdriiY3IUagIq9P n1wxIxpPppY6fqZThkJ/VZXMO79pGdckWxYtF5EAE2+Ldzs9hlKnI2VYu5KjhEnJ4ltA b1qvrI86N3yTAGR5b881gAPYrBk8jOD+ZtF6xjFkrp8i2R/gtaJgw1fHPmt3Cm/J/fBT y4fg== X-Received: by 10.14.103.69 with SMTP id e45mr3996754eeg.51.1384105719185; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:48:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.15.98.68 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:47:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87mwlcp33l.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c00::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165119 Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Jambunathan K wrote: > No I don't know where the problem lies. But restoration of framesizes > happened only after you added frameset changes. (Prior to that I just > used to maximize the inital frame, store it in a register, dump that > register in to my .emacs in a frame alist or some var like that) You can turn off the frame-restoring stuff by setting/customizing desktop-restore-frames to nil. > IME, this is a polite way of saying STFU. I can if that is what you > want. Let me know. When I want to say STFU, I usually say "STFU". So no. What I'm saying is that the things frameset.el does are complex, not because inherent complexity, but by Emacs and window-manager quirks and implementation details. So changes that do not break other places aren't trivial, and currently I do not have much time to work on it. Also, the problem you're reporting seems to me a bit of a non-problem (I mean, maximizing while Emacs is trying to restore the frames doesn't seem a good idea to me). But if you post a patch, I'll look into it. Just don't forget that any change should work not only on the various GNU/Linux wm, but also Windows and NS. J