On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:

> There are two ways of fixing bug #19706:
>
> The first is to put in special case handling for missing frame
> parameters, pray that the same error isn't already programmed into our
> source anywhere else, and trust our highly skilled hackers never to
> blunder into the same trap again.

The framesets code already tries to deal with the different parameter lists in graphic vs. tty frames. Seems like it doesn't work right in this case. I'll take a look ASAP.

> The second is to set the frame parameters appropriately for tty's.

Well, IIUC, reducing differences between parameter lists in different kinds of frames is always good, if at all possible.