From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making --with-wide-int the default Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:28:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <54E0D181.2080802@dancol.org> <83r3trulse.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0D7E0.305@87.69.4.28> <83h9unukbg.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0DEF8.7020901@dancol> <83egpruiyp.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0FF93.2000104@dancol.org> <5610ED13.1010406@dancol.org> <56117F37.9060808@dancol.org> <83oag087gs.fsf@gnu.org> <83oafz70im.fsf@gnu.org> <5620AF43.4050401@cs.ucla.edu> <83k2qn6xfm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3f5c4c205c2052234962d X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444984179 12957 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2015 08:29:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 16 10:29:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn0OE-0006TI-NX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:29:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51603 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn0OD-0000Vg-Ue for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 04:29:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn0Nx-0000VZ-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 04:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn0Nw-00089b-VB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 04:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]:34313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn0Nv-00088d-5f; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 04:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: by lbbwb3 with SMTP id wb3so33349352lbb.1; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9+KTC4X3uonJaDkToAC7kibiH1MnmUO3pwIJNZSK5M4=; b=aBTL0WmSwSn+UlEFFIJxIwf7m/WRzHEYRBCmwe/wUuJc6dYVj2AL6NEpGYDf89pDc5 YpHxljNd0SxYxBv33xJx5n0YuORGG5aOlDak/ZZn1SShWggaxYQk3mHh3gc2asnyKbSP xjEPzx41EagJQ9BJUWtrqa1Ml7JhOTw3Rx40sZjghrdld84VpmIu1X8nPqcHbQDPl+oD iNpPj3ylXjvC4xqPlM6j9qWIZTw2wChP0fWZc6kXSmen2maTunvDVcKXHOWCODY6rLkQ cHaUVwXDX4PlQaITC+E0vkgTRg51SY1lzDKv8hOMJnipTo0YPprpbAc8n/XhZQTjCWxm J8RQ== X-Received: by 10.112.54.169 with SMTP id k9mr7345330lbp.95.1444984146493; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.217.135 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:28:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k2qn6xfm.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191722 Archived-At: --001a11c3f5c4c205c2052234962d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From: Paul Eggert > > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:03:15 -0700 > > I typically use 64-bit platforms nowadays, where the issue is moot. When I do > > use 32-bit platforms, I normally configure --with-wide-int. There is roughly a > > 30% CPU hit and maybe a 60% hit on virtual memory, but it's worth it to me (I > > normally don't notice the difference). > > Thanks, that about summarizes what I see here as well. Are we talking of a 30% CPU hit in non-optimized builds, right? --001a11c3f5c4c205c2052234962d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > = Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> = > From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.= ucla.edu>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:03:15 -0700

=
> > I typically use 64-bit platforms nowadays, where the issue i= s moot. When I do
> > use 32-bit platforms, I normally configure -= -with-wide-int. There is roughly a
> > 30% CPU hit and maybe a 60%= hit on virtual memory, but it's worth it to me (I
> > normall= y don't notice the difference).
>
> Thanks, that about summ= arizes what I see here as well.

Are we talking of a 30% C= PU hit in non-optimized builds, right?
--001a11c3f5c4c205c2052234962d--