From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS for W32 Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:38:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87aa634st8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fwfvsgfv.fsf@wanadoo.es> <877h17scdo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87hb0b77nr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739bvs27m.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87ty4b4329.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hb0b3yoe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6ED011D5-E185-44C6-BB31-A445A4E5F83A@gmail.com> <87wr976otx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipkq6yy5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boqi6tzz.fsf@linux-hvfx.site> <87ehve3ul8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lipl22xm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boqh20ha.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325806771 7139 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 23:39:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:39:31 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 06 00:39:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Riwu6-0008Fq-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:39:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59575 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riwu6-00022l-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:39:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33099) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riwu4-00022g-8k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:39:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riwu3-0003Hr-5P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:42720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Riwu2-0003Hn-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:39:23 -0500 Original-Received: by pbdd2 with SMTP id d2so981923pbd.0 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:39:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c70RKSInDD8gLKN7ONsUPtV1ij2/F4NnfsPrLOoH6oE=; b=I2s8HSjmPKLzBJKTVULtAMHEQ7CW6d3BKNLIDjpE6vP/HUsg/YwqPK9AD4Qr6KFe+k ycPwvtj5BSBZAllMF9aDSQLP+TdAf+zk2paju2/vZLCn7WtvO0qXYBKuuTQT5jvFoPlR 0iG7x+FT7U7UURwGm36MlRo4nRBdnJOf0XhTE= Original-Received: by 10.68.74.233 with SMTP id x9mr9770242pbv.74.1325806762177; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:39:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.247.28 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:38:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87boqh20ha.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.160.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147368 Archived-At: 2012/1/6 Ted Zlatanov : > I meant Emacs, the software, not just its binary form. =C2=A0Forget the > binaries; you and Lars are protesting a startup check that critical > packages like GnuTLS are not out of date. When you say that, you are not talking about gnutls.el, you are talking about the GnuTLS binary, so no, I cannot forget the binaries. That's the whole point of the discussion (at least, of the part of the discussion I'm involved in). > I can't think of a better way to > notify them that an Emacs component is out of date and possibly > compromising their security. The GnuTLS binary is *not* an "Emacs component". =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma