From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Freezing frameset-restore Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:33:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5318AFF6.8020206@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394127270 17866 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2014 17:34:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 17:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 06 18:34:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WLcBq-0002uJ-OW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:34:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLcBq-0002fo-3k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:34:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLcBm-0002fJ-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:34:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLcBl-0002wi-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:34:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yh0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22e]:58997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLcBl-0002we-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:34:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yh0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b6so10453yha.19 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:34:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=m3VT33vO842BrYkxzi3BpsooQWoSPe5djYs1ci/0498=; b=ZIlkKiFmaKZV6vjX89y3QPldLi+dU/Th8oqjSukOE8KvIzOfibg/mdAqJEsxTPjTay ZRyGipo47hjI2f9SwdnoaOKmLBdSJf1yVtfb2dVb51KIYhl1PouoHLwh3+SXJXJ7UC28 0hjCStQ9j6RMz4XCPLlIcmvozIzWlXeXDf8PE2uXgQcNHtYMAABqTiktgq+QvbgTzhxS aAkDWgYUFHefl5oM88qANIES8K3jwLofi1IBdG2Wfqu+5RBDX03a1BRfVc9TsxAQ6z88 eSupV+rHyVZrxNTvJpIpYpxd5GwiztXbkhv7ivsVwEAKEBkOwwquOxTIcSi4EEVzse3u 2xQw== X-Received: by 10.236.159.65 with SMTP id r41mr16616175yhk.20.1394127273127; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:34:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:33:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5318AFF6.8020206@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170182 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:27 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > Why the term "restored" here and not "reused"? "Restored frames" describes (or tries to) all frames that are the result of restoration, that is, reused frames and new ones (created specifically to be restored upon). Please suggest a better wording, my brain has an overdose of the words "frame", "window", "restore" and "reuse" and cannot think straight. > IIUC "cleanup" means to take care of frames that were not "reused". No, the meaning of CLEANUP is to take care of all frames. It just that most of the time, reused and created frames will be left alone. But... > understand that we should take care of "rejected" or "ignored" frames. > But why care about "reused" and "created" ones? ...what if you want to iconify all restored frames too, or just count them and do something about it? Again, perhaps CLEANUP is not the best name for the argument. Suggestions? J