From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117000: Untabify cl-macs.el Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:03:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5354663D.3050107@dancol.org> <837g6jduo5.fsf@gnu.org> <5354C519.9090005@dancol.org> <83tx9ncc29.fsf@gnu.org> <5354D99B.5090101@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398081868 18150 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2014 12:04:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 21 14:04:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WcCxP-0002Tw-KT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:04:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48673 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcCxP-0007vJ-37 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 08:04:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcCxM-0007vE-B9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 08:04:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcCxK-0005Za-Qx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 08:04:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::236]:41026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WcCxE-0005XC-CP; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 08:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 142so3300761ykq.13 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 05:04:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=z0HmmhnntTTxanX3PJiot3AuRfjxhFGr/nWj+N9gPYc=; b=cjLxlcFJIgbOKBhS58OPLwI0eE2LP0auQxD0WSRQoZ0QR4uZvPHx6+DeQNtK0HJH5J aHymTCYAqgp9rx8V7EMkVLbyjn+EsTZPtSMEZBaMh402knYqB53AxpEnlSJ9nm6bu/ZT LDUDjt/rb89jFGPNTXdYDSuAv7QZxG4kAk7FXeF3uzU67auD7x6bVXUiglJ4wTNT/WjS 1HiKtZZ4kga9up5M5c6B/3B3t/JQY+gHcMvoFVZhU6J781fva8+FnR9YftxnQv3fRyQW T/FEeOzkRwF8EfF8ItLc5BX9Ya0oXDdiZQRv9RV5M9KbnWhGWvTE1fGEEk3ZXnxC1rCe GOhQ== X-Received: by 10.236.166.39 with SMTP id f27mr2091532yhl.116.1398081847213; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 05:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 05:03:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5354D99B.5090101@dancol.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171530 Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > No, we can only control what code gets into Emacs. Even so, is not for you alone to decide what goes or doesn't go into the Emacs repo. This is a long standing issue, and the consensus is, more or less, that you do what you want with the code you write, and you try not to change it gratuitously in other code you fix (so, not (un)?tabifying an entire file just because you commit a fix to it). Anything else is bound to cause much discussion and grief. (I prefer untabified code, BTW.) J