From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new name for the state of a set of frames? Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 01:39:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <51F8CBD0.7020708@gmx.at> <87txjbt175.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87ehaevqly.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87li4l79ra.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y58l2mau.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <8738qtxei4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87wqo5vzcr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375400395 2491 80.91.229.3 (1 Aug 2013 23:39:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 23:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , Emacs developers , Juri Linkov , martin rudalics , Thien-Thi Nguyen , chad To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 02 01:39:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V52TJ-0005Vl-IM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 01:39:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V52TJ-0000xq-6X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V52TF-0000v3-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V52TE-0003Uu-Gd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22b]:33713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V52TA-0003TH-RQ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:39:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e52so1286210eek.16 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:39:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1Moapnoazlp4j6jsyK6eQZE0C8/PgFEcEEbkt8dwPJI=; b=BTTniAuA352n9JC3N4luPztvP5xVrRPrmVkJrcahcNWfqs4nD2LjA7Y/F2UvK/c6rH gaNVYlFirWeBXl/tyq5jufT1sJJQ8B8jQdzV+rmhYBEOFUGDcNrNKiNohupSN7q+mehw PXQ69Z/xv9DyqZRjT4xIbh1MtD5k1JaCJM+Hh5iAh0LuCjIKaQfuUPNrcpRlDwUj6ZfS 7ZLFpAcoZD+vSMUSLkni79VVVYQnAZPZJiZDI+Kd2n6yy88GeZ+OrqA2R2mo9tEvfoSM GDM0QfidwWDD/iriDAkeGG9sxd1ZQktW5P0eOecUcEF/1QMPB3TqnG3P2jGel4zBiEBh Zaow== X-Received: by 10.15.111.69 with SMTP id ci45mr3432803eeb.14.1375400383877; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.15.23.70 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:39:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c00::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162348 Archived-At: > frameset/windowset sounds OK. OK, I'll go forward with frameset and will put my index fingers into my ears and sing loudly to fend off any other suggestions until this is finally committed. > It has the downside of insisting on the > "set of frames", disregarding the fact that it doesn't actually contain > frames whereas it does contain frame descriptions. ...and windowsets. All in all, I think a frameset does contain frames all right, it's just that they're feeling a bit disembodied. > E.g. contrast with the `fileset's we have elsewhere. I wouldn't say that a fileset "contains" files. J