From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 23:49:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <560CCEBA.9080607@online.de> <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> <87lhbmkrle.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si5r22qh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <56103479.6090900@online.de> <87k2r31znz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114066d2d3149205213a42b9 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443909017 26786 80.91.229.3 (3 Oct 2015 21:50:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 21:50:17 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 03 23:50:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiUh3-0002tS-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 23:50:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiUh2-0005YQ-8r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 17:50:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiUgo-0005Y8-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 17:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiUgn-0000RH-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 17:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]:36048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiUgn-0000RD-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 17:49:57 -0400 Original-Received: by lalw10 with SMTP id w10so10204108lal.3 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:49:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=lArN9pkmkERqnb6lcu7MymBDIViJiXLzWY/4Fw4+xw8=; b=MWkQ+R50STqHbz39yGrw4ogYwfK1ewcv7Gmxa5jrNRODCwl4Dxlzi7sLU4hro55zZa qecJ9b953I+loOVvT/T0+7/+0h2eaFIje+quVs0JCESx11XLsvjQZ5QqEaqCkC/Nqztq HYxFq+RbGY2G1cQnwJaWFJ0nKuSkWWlFq45hQi09lFsVaQR3tKoymA+kumRPCG7y39Pg Rom2CUFvIVkxGRKQsV0G12g7Khu24rpGuCQap8WJpxuOj7C5EmIaG/AkKEd40n3SjUDG 95GuIkzwXIne3Hf5oI2SUMggbfmQU8tUcvNGYLP6Doo5dAV21u9uS2J/k11c5AubZdUb rpKg== X-Received: by 10.25.80.77 with SMTP id e74mr5452604lfb.11.1443908996500; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.217.135 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:49:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190832 Archived-At: --001a114066d2d3149205213a42b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, John Wiegley wrote: > What bothers me are the socialistic aspects involved, the _way_ RMS demonizes > other approaches to licensing (eerily similar to how socialism demonizes other > political philosophies), Perhaps we should leave non-software-related politics out of this discussion. Reading "socialistic" as a pejorative could be a bit jarring for some of us. --001a114066d2d3149205213a42b9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, John Wiegley <= johnw@newartisans.com> wrot= e:

> What bothers me are the socialistic aspects involved, t= he _way_ RMS demonizes
> other approaches to licensing (eerily simila= r to how socialism demonizes other
> political philosophies),

Perhaps we should leave non-software-related politics= out of this discussion. Reading "socialistic" as a pejorative co= uld be a bit jarring for some of us.
--001a114066d2d3149205213a42b9--