From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Annoying (frameset bug?): desktop-mode and maxmized frame Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:29:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ob5srgmz.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjpcpe9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwlcp33l.fsf@gmail.com> <87txfjcr3p.fsf@gmail.com> <8738n3447s.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384173016 1260 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2013 12:30:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 11 13:30:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VfqdG-0007ku-VH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:30:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36335 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfqdG-00005K-FA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:30:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfqdD-00005F-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:30:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vfqd8-0001eh-HB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:30:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::229]:57194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vfqd8-0001eP-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:30:10 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e53so2426073eek.0 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 04:30:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9NhGsTe01y/GulRHR1XZLg5ckjZHM4HL0hKo903I3YM=; b=YqWLXGLBi+xGrXTOmRANBkhkbUC2XIy7T0Rni8o89W5ufwyhBsOEp3NjBkvUlxnaJq V2p9xMKKzV/easB1GxOOfuNECqJDooVKvF3ilLdNw6A6hlj80lBnpPHHzqonQ0jlDDXh EkGN82fLz3Jio2UBI6nKqJ5bDgVQ0LwX9P+1pjyuZLL7yJTQstxntDu5uUesm/bcRLvO /ZEU6s2/D/3yV7RBBNS65CjMnQp0312Oz1ok6rP4KIvdglpzPqpIjkbQA4CAYniH/nei tUrmKuRH+LWS7vjsdbN0mtQDxjsdtfZUQfLFc/ih/bUVyIZdBHPj+zyEfaCqrKzxrDJC 6DMg== X-Received: by 10.14.207.132 with SMTP id n4mr128347eeo.102.1384173008875; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 04:30:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.15.98.68 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 04:29:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8738n3447s.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c00::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165159 Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Jambunathan K wrote: > No, I use a single frame. I don't plan to use multiple frames. I'm not surprised your proposed change works for you, then. But it can not possibly work for multi-(frames|windows) setups, because if you restore frames before buffers you screw up the window-buffer correspondences. Anyway, if you use a single-frame setup, I don't understand why you do use desktop-restore-frames. It would seem more logical to turn if off and maximize the single frame by other means (like initial-frame-alist or some of the initialization hooks,depending on the moment you want the frame to maximize). J