From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to restore the layout? Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 00:06:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <51CA0D4C.7080204@alice.it> <51CC3E42.7020409@alice.it> <51CC4CC1.3030202@alice.it> <51CC8403.1030009@gmx.at> <51CCA56A.8000508@gmx.at> <51CCA7DC.8060605@gmx.at> <83fvw2g44j.fsf@gnu.org> <51CE9B05.1090202@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372543661 7740 80.91.229.3 (29 Jun 2013 22:07:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 22:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Angelo Graziosi , Emacs developers , Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , Stephen Berman , Jambunathan K To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 30 00:07:42 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ut3J0-0003QK-4x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 00:07:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47336 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ut3Iz-0007p4-Fw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ut3Ix-0007oy-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ut3Iu-0005MO-Vd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]:38253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ut3It-0005Lo-EB; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:07:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hj3so1964655wib.6 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:07:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tXZAL7iIY1q+bTp/auEdVkMtz6XLV6hwQY3hSvwnZ/k=; b=WidtHF5bDdVOX62yCPg1ZADAHjEvjIY4o6hgjRwzsaVJBhgNA4NhxBrtGHbIIoZfgI 2TgUPDmZAZWJP/QNXVzevfcsgBNes8XXQL5DVez4Rgjx6WoDoNUZsGmSCO6vQMpvwZlr E+uBFEvc+csZ3m9eyjFXFECPbbS+OM17/5uG/S4vnG4brGTmC+umwzPwKxZQRAFwi1aA DLJYmmP+qGxgZ2KqiSfv0yvVKM6fjhdVZC+SMfa+pPjCVYedhW8G6OF+M2cVz8BAffm4 aD9ZKvhIcR6gd0WDxeIB2JOOzhuOncj0pQ19odRX03m9+wVzN4TuEq0ub6pO/Fteukwc hc8g== X-Received: by 10.194.63.229 with SMTP id j5mr15361901wjs.79.1372543654746; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.14.142.4 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:06:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51CE9B05.1090202@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161302 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:29 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > We probably should also rename the basic > option to `desktop-restore-frames' I'm OK with that, or any other name, as long as there's some consensus and we don't have to change it too many times ;-) > and include an option for frame > positioning/sizing where the latter could assume values like 'accurate > or 'sloppy with 'accurate trying to restore positions and sizes as > accurately as possible, while 'sloppy could, for example, try to > reposition and/or resize frames so they fit a new screen dimension. I don't see how that could be integrated with desktop-save-windows/desktop-restore-frames options that I proposed. Seems like a different configuration option to me (unless you want to multiply the available options: all-frames-and-displays-accurate, all-frames-and-displays-sloppy, local-state-accurate, local-state-sloppy, current-display-accurate, current-display-sloppy. Is that what you're suggesting (leaving aside the precise option names, of course)? J