From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposed new core library: pl.el Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:19:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <563ABD66.6070700@yandex.ru> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446715182 21245 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2015 09:19:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 05 10:19:42 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuGhp-0005LC-PY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:19:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuGhk-0001P8-Ak for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuGhg-0001Ot-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:19:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuGhf-0003Wj-V2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:19:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]:33392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuGhf-0003WR-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: by lfbf136 with SMTP id f136so54564695lfb.0 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:19:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2LIVlEE+tGOxKkVdx8WDQwtpzuburQPlaGRM4rMrxAs=; b=zgKpN6Z5/7a1JH0ltn7LdklCsJFJm8YKrKshvWb4R1ei4CrhklIMwMvvy53gJjSj2w b2DJnQ7j9qbHr11yLW3tjf8hLjOu4tGgOgQ+8aPo0o2WhsFL1V7GqYtO34lW4IWn5+Ke bacUzSn2n3Hq+xuNiLNKfRS6SrWRoDdCNOxf8ssQBFBVsrOPSZqnhnOZfjhlUCmk6Iod S9yg11R8nPoI6VHpMh5/YRAS1t7zpbfB/WSIMsjKYr8mdTC5s42TVhvxYTl+FfG5tJqH 1tnEzd94Cg8xsOaXD1DpZGu66qDSfRGethxR9YmTJuE9iLmrSaWpis7ZyQTMd6NwVUWp kBhQ== X-Received: by 10.25.21.70 with SMTP id l67mr1030246lfi.27.1446715170912; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:19:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.63.70 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:19:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <563ABD66.6070700@yandex.ru> X-Google-Sender-Auth: oLJzR2MJ28HbXsLD_V6Dkh5uaIU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193279 Archived-At: 2015-11-05 2:22 GMT+00:00 Dmitry Gutov : > On 11/05/2015 04:14 AM, John Wiegley wrote: > >> There is room for improving performance, but the API is complete enough to >> start using it. Giving the unproven status, though, perhaps it should >> start >> out in ELPA, and move to core after it has solidified and gained some >> users? > > I think the rule for moving new stuff out of ELPA should be whether it's > used by the core. That's for libraries. > > For utility packages (ui/commands/etc), the question should be asked: if it > works fine in ELPA, why move? Popularizing ELPA would be better, IMHO. I think pl.el would be fine on Gelpa. I've personally never felt the need for this in core (though I've definitely missed it when writing some external packages).