From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Supporting multiline Package-Requires header Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:53:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877fp3dxt2.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnef40io.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134800e68b10f051cf6fe2a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439222063 29961 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2015 15:54:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 10 17:54:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOpP3-0005XK-8i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:54:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59043 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOpP2-00013u-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOpOk-00013g-2k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOpOi-0005Sg-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]:36424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOpOi-0005SC-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so56001868lag.3 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cZKILmSNIqqrjxNrXTSFtGU+Xs582wSDhonk8KHlZbA=; b=XZmYHAfxC0l/dPMR6iC5sTtC02EQpQQZ9ogoJzdBCyXhLEgLXGZeKzA1L02m+OsUAk Oa0WHW/WggoCR6sl+2Ot1bm6vvl4FrnfTz2DXLYdqCLOK5xtxMlmnnj2/1uS7rn0twrx b2Mk45ngh2kVgLbLFVsu7OkXC7eVn6JbRKSJZIPj2bMu69/NA2b6kQT45zu1nFveyyDU pSnEpMrpzAFYEDbJFx1wl66JM3iqnhbl3rkkxqf7oUDNjaPfJ0R/LSTEGUyEjaqz+dz7 oUzs83aMQT1rOaJ4f0qJtF0fxOXzNw6TOKj8QH5sM1c7AbWbdaW1ddWz2f2O6UC3n4Nt felw== X-Received: by 10.112.67.65 with SMTP id l1mr10397920lbt.86.1439222039357; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.134.139 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.134.139 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bnef40io.fsf@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5tcDm59tKb1qOzhtF7fK1GuXPF8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188686 Archived-At: --001a1134800e68b10f051cf6fe2a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Aug 10, 2015 4:38 PM, "Thierry Volpiatto" wrote: > > > Artur Malabarba writes: > > >> I suggest keeping what we have actually for backward compatibility and > >> generalize the use of a *-pkg.el file with a define-package form even > >> for single file packages. > > > > The proposed changes don't break backwards compatbility. > > I understood this. > > I suggest not using anymore the source files to display such > informations, but instead the *-pkg.el file, which is cleaner IMO. I see. Then what do you mean by generalize? Don't we already support using the -pkg file wherever it's present? (genuine question, not rethorical). --001a1134800e68b10f051cf6fe2a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Aug 10, 2015 4:38 PM, "Thierry Volpiatto" <thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> I suggest keeping what we have actually for backward compatibility and
> >> generalize the use of a *-pkg.el file with a define-package form even
> >> for single file packages.
> >
> > The proposed changes don't break backwards compatbility.
>
> I understood this.
>
> I suggest not using anymore the source files to display such
> informations, but instead the *-pkg.el file, which is cleaner IMO.

I see.
Then what do you mean by generalize? Don't we already support using the -pkg file wherever it's present? (genuine question, not rethorical).

--001a1134800e68b10f051cf6fe2a--