From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bitten by lexical-binding
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 14:12:13 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAdUY-KnzZwkZMjLnAB+F9CiviGzwVhekFAg_gBERF27_cgJCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9b834ee9-4f63-42ca-98b4-c0f14986642e@default>
Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448201549 1463 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2015 14:12:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 14:12:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 22 15:12:28 2015
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1a0VNT-0002L0-8s
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 15:12:27 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56217 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1a0VNT-0006Yw-DS
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:12:27 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59377)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arturmalabarba@gmail.com>) id 1a0VNH-0006Yb-6y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:12:15 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arturmalabarba@gmail.com>) id 1a0VNG-0006NU-Hf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:12:15 -0500
Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]:32964)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arturmalabarba@gmail.com>) id 1a0VNG-0006NQ-Ae
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:12:14 -0500
Original-Received: by lfaz4 with SMTP id z4so93722315lfa.0
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 06:12:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=aSvB+0WBwuPVBJ8Oz0nsEFPPTKVm/8BxJ5QBqpi5ZzA=;
	b=JbLY6l2GvCZgKjTKpjW07/wondTB3MQkmEPkvGRV2W+RGCxhKNBmbGKiAcLqMGOprm
	fwy9mGj89GKjlqtdbTzEFKpzrPZCB3dmRQ17Jip1CLhU/xfsi+MjB9LZKORvF6bJ7jfx
	ilXg9lvGoKGx9fIEh3Wf86S9mXDd+IHNXcekZE/t5DYpHPkX8NG+fJM0FAZ0ZapP67HR
	LSD6ZUMI6ou1DX8+6kkDHXIaIn+09e6Gdrl33dBvc7ueQvfoqv0qPdYO7ycyg8RwES1H
	EYxeYz885qR181dLfuGPY+NXNLfD+lTVE3O/mWAhUFRkK4TIsSbQaF+j2Bx29a85Daef
	dZcQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.18.92 with SMTP id h89mr5498064lfi.54.1448201533404; Sun,
	22 Nov 2015 06:12:13 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 06:12:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9b834ee9-4f63-42ca-98b4-c0f14986642e@default>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vh0CWma-fd6LNPG49-C3ap_0HRg
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
	(bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::229
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195013
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/195013>

> It turned out (though I do not understand completely) that
> the only thing I needed to do was to add a `lexical-binding'
> declaration to my file.  (Luckily, the code in the file did
> not depend on dynamic binding.)

>From what I understand, lexical-binding definitely shouldn't have
affected this. Do you think you can come up with some self-contained
reproduction steps?