From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: streams are cool, you could stream virtually anything! Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 00:02:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <8737wl9w5f.fsf@web.de> <87bnb8kd82.fsf@petton.fr> <87wptwirxw.fsf@petton.fr> <877flwl7ee.fsf@web.de> <87y4ecglb5.fsf@petton.fr> <22075.59289.690185.199808@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114012667dca260523d3f409 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446768153 28596 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2015 00:02:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 00:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel To: raman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 06 01:02:27 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuUU6-0001rA-Sj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:02:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36024 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuUU6-0003Hy-9e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:02:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuUTs-0003Ht-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:02:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuUTr-0003cL-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:02:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]:36504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuUTr-0003cH-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: by lfs39 with SMTP id 39so35074861lfs.3 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 16:02:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RITGN3WMWDg7Wt8Q9uRHzYKLtucAbRYuTGdjyBV/+To=; b=rfyz5zJcHQ69TZ5Fw/jGzWJk374ZBjqBGOLmtrEvKmgJ4id8SYmsCzvc5F41M6k8TK ks1I2Ilb2tVPBQOXFgkJ3IiEEjKtTGkBL0sBaEZ0FcYGuirO43ne5+CnUopd8JeqrBtK jh7Zb4/yDZV875BuyoqoGH2ni4WMDIlZstRf9zS9cMtcO67gjO9sE1lJRdVlmsd6RWS7 cFyeZ76F2QmAjSHAPr0YTkeKoDkqsHxAZG3qCr2bD0lUDn/aa/HBIUq9+MAdnX2odvRy XETmwN7uoEgLJE1DFepE3oy732BR6dRJubNfxIBkNHjJ5K3Y6LqWRBuv8aqU4O8ht68v ss5g== X-Received: by 10.25.164.134 with SMTP id n128mr3013395lfe.3.1446768130507; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 16:02:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.63.70 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:02:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.63.70 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:02:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <22075.59289.690185.199808@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: CgC9qkhVCqR0ZmpRhEfmlq9LMxQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193361 Archived-At: --001a114012667dca260523d3f409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 5 Nov 2015 11:34 pm, "T.V Raman" wrote: > > I still like these things to be in pairs, and I'm not particularly > sold on having stream-pop. Perhaps slightly unrelated, but I don't even think of push pop as a pair. I mean, I see the obvious the relation. It's just that I've never even used them in the same function, even though I use both a lot. But I digress. I haven't even used stream.el yet, so I'm just assuming stream-pop would be as useful as pop. --001a114012667dca260523d3f409 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 5 Nov 2015 11:34 pm, "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> wrote:
>
> I still=C2=A0 like these things to be in pairs, and I'm not partic= ularly
> sold on having stream-pop.

Perhaps slightly unrelated, but I don't even think of pu= sh pop as a pair. I mean, I see the obvious the relation. It's just tha= t I've never even used them in the same function, even though I use bot= h a lot.

But I digress. I haven't even used stream.el yet, so I&#= 39;m just assuming stream-pop would be as useful as pop.

--001a114012667dca260523d3f409--