From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GIT mirror of Lisp dev sources [was: Char-folding: how can we implement matching...] Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:52:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8737vm2fan.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114069d40adc2f0525daaa00 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448995999 27388 80.91.229.3 (1 Dec 2015 18:53:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams , emacs-devel To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 01 19:53:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a3q34-0006Mw-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 19:53:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54432 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3q34-00074e-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45689) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3q2n-00071V-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:52:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3q2m-00049D-A4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:52:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]:36399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3q2k-00048N-LQ; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:52:50 -0500 Original-Received: by lfs39 with SMTP id 39so18903760lfs.3; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:52:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yrf1vv+i5JcgPyeMC6A2KV+GnlsoFeK3zEa3HTC699c=; b=v36Ng2Cl61N8hdrBqEYxmxpB8YBkVTUgNhdtHO/W/J0PoW+hcnHJe+kwGwHWnDBB/6 cIKHn7pL4pR/69q0vFOjFOf+4GeWQyapXQdxqiO/0pJYrABwJlusQX4UNnZXFX+v8rVa SrY+EysDmOBw1LyPTBKyKahivJbx1SIfUCugkCPv4QbpINUmoADshIqP9oEzyHs9LtLw bXcnmUvARYt4Xgi2o9hGO437msDLBLOeBQUBXKSRE1ZEWlaBFbDeQQy5/Oa7w/6usggv QO/t4qsL9WhfeNueG8jTbxGYF3RWM6LObfJ2oI7yHaKhUOZIdp6f9r7bBSDVL8JwAm5v mZwA== X-Received: by 10.25.19.69 with SMTP id j66mr30770714lfi.25.1448995969487; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:52:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 10:52:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 10:52:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8737vm2fan.fsf@red-bean.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: rQjvoKJG5IqLxtjLPRUQVkf3yXs X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195704 Archived-At: --001a114069d40adc2f0525daaa00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 1 Dec 2015 6:29 pm, "Karl Fogel" wrote: > > Drew Adams writes: > >(Why doesn't master hold the latest developments, just as > >(IIUC) it has always done in the past?) > > During release stabilization, at least in recent releases that I can remember, the maintainers have asked that changes go to the release branch first and then get ported to 'master' later. Except for new features, that is. The emacs-25 branch is for refining what will get release. The master branch is still the place where we add brand new stuff. --001a114069d40adc2f0525daaa00 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 1 Dec 2015 6:29 pm, "Karl Fogel" <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:
>
> Drew Adams <drew.adams@ora= cle.com> writes:
> >(Why doesn't master hold the latest developments, just as
> >(IIUC) it has always done in the past?)
>
> During release stabilization, at least in recent releases that I can r= emember, the maintainers have asked that changes go to the release branch f= irst and then get ported to 'master' later.=C2=A0

Except for new features, that is. The emacs-25 branch is for= refining what will get release. The master branch is still the place where= we add brand new stuff.

--001a114069d40adc2f0525daaa00--