From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:03:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87twosp5ke.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fv0cm64g.fsf@gmx.us> <87si4bsktk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptnlbl6.fsf@gmx.us> <87pozfl2ut.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1vfl17p.fsf@gmx.us> <878u63p6sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pozfchq6.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9komkty.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ziydbgnd.fsf@red-bean.com> <87r3jnoxpc.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447880659 4023 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2015 21:04:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , Pierpaolo Bernardi , emacs-devel To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 22:04:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9tp-00047z-4W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:04:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38411 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9to-00019k-HR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:04:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9tZ-000190-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9tZ-0003CD-1j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:04:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]:33929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz9tX-0003Bj-B9; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:03:59 -0500 Original-Received: by lffu14 with SMTP id u14so35152271lff.1; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:03:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cmQWd3TVXGBU/zxpicydNddSg8U58iVdghf1hwDIqoA=; b=kW9Xw5ShWB+HV8SKZVIXSAMeNPS27QxSCLI5Zd6pBcQfV88rZweRFd4iC+3RBXUlHp B+RhD39HxQaEnd2oCCkCkRW+kr8TgzEl1i+WMNxNX5ybQFbYqqYRfiMh/3B4/gWk930E 9/bWoRUkvMkkhyBW+r0W8SN+UOiM/KKGnmN/wIZn+GjiE0fFP+yS9gizio59x8xtbOgk /bNcfOIQs+W/A4GLK4A3snpfSY5hpz+aPwuZcprVGf4SJgH7pqWEQlMTbdCi/Y4wN/AU ZKEpr1UI2HRtjRaC/wBlbErPhmqlNmCXxVS02UHVJGfnwnLc3Y08m4yR3V2CWAhqBQSz C/SQ== X-Received: by 10.25.211.194 with SMTP id k185mr1709487lfg.119.1447880638482; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:03:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:03:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r3jnoxpc.fsf@red-bean.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: SXZQW8ubOjMnTeRseEX2UJlh2cU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194757 Archived-At: 2015-11-18 20:32 GMT+00:00 Karl Fogel : > Thanks for letting us know, Artur. > > If you're swamped, I'm happy to do the reversion (pretty easy for me, since I've been following the changes & the thread in detail), but I won't unless you say so. Yes, you have my "OK" to revert this change completely. TBH, this doesn't really affect me :-). Normally I just use aggressive-indent-mode for all my indentation needs. I only realised I wanted to change C-o while doing some edits from emacs -Q. However, if you do revert, it would be nice if you kept the tests I added (some of them will need to be fixed, of course). > (Can only guess that "most important day" is Ph.D. defense? Break a leg!) Thanks. :-) It is indeed. Cheers