From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:34:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9kscqig.fsf@red-bean.com> <83vb98jqwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2poba1s.fsf@red-bean.com> <83si4cjnyw.fsf@gnu.org> <87twosp5ke.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fv0cm64g.fsf@gmx.us> <87si4bsktk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptnlbl6.fsf@gmx.us> <87pozfl2ut.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1vfl17p.fsf@gmx.us> <878u63p6sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pozfchq6.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447526700 17913 80.91.229.3 (14 Nov 2015 18:45:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 18:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Pierpaolo Bernardi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 14 19:45:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxfoo-0006sh-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 19:44:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36564 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxfon-0003q2-7t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 13:44:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxa1q-0000jY-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 07:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxa1p-0002iE-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 07:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]:34902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxa1p-0002hy-LX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 07:34:01 -0500 Original-Received: by lfdo63 with SMTP id o63so65659996lfd.2 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 04:34:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0EIsXsxfRX0hDyAIPOJ2x6yyHrCj0vwjt3G87PaqYHg=; b=L56i3eDtv+raEh0AS7Iyz8oDZYZV2SYglVygCg/zSWvgwpHA9eR8ggLmsWIlC7AgCx Qap5K8LNmU5DEm19133DXK2cnhKK/xyPuj9NjnA2K1TM2dAS15PsMawiX+pJn+jJxPxK bUiDEQ0PifJ4XYlVRzBV6IqXm+5uw5kJ5OLP1mCy3lvmD8fV0YlwddnFwgt3+u14P3LW i8KVsPvWr369sa0WI/DdmxTmltZK01cPYIwTmrZzlSOe3SS53KEYsqjxEDT7uCVa7aw2 Ju1S16hvH37RyZmqM1qAa7d3ZjAxMWwQ38q9OLSMeknMViQhNGIUu/QYZYpFtiIxUsT5 BEyQ== X-Received: by 10.25.23.42 with SMTP id n42mr13077972lfi.42.1447504440928; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 04:34:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.63.70 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 04:34:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: MDBBRfTLDwwUwWua6DxzZN3eaic X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194463 Archived-At: 2015-11-13 6:04 GMT+00:00 Pierpaolo Bernardi : > The old behaviour is: ctrl-o inserts a newline after the point, > nothing else is done. Ok, thanks for clarifying. Still can I ask for an example usage where that behaviour is good and the current behaviour is bad. I'm not trying to be annoying here. It's just that I want to clearly list all relevant scenarios when I write the commit message (so that future hackers will know about them before changing some behaviour). Cheers