From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding async package to GNU ELPA Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:52:07 -0200 Message-ID: References: <20151224213932.12107.84317@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <5681C474.4030408@yandex.ru> <87wprxpq4n.fsf@gmx.de> <87h9j114ay.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <87si2kywix.fsf@gmx.de> <87io3fzkrv.fsf@gmx.de> <87k2nummb5.fsf@gmail.com> <878u49dds5.fsf@gmail.com> <87bn95ppt1.fsf@gmx.de> <87si2dztio.fsf@gmx.de> <877fjly19b.fsf@gmx.de> <871t9ttb22.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fbcbed0d3e30528c4a40c X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452199947 25218 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2016 20:52:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel , Thierry Volpiatto To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 21:52:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHHXi-00011T-Nu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 21:52:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60998 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHHXh-00048c-VF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHHXU-00047n-Tb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHHXU-0007TV-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:52:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234]:33109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHHXT-0007TR-T5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id k129so320149606yke.0 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:52:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=u/vzczUp6+EbqGDQEfjXUX9ZCOH/pd/qI2G/8oCnfbs=; b=SAigv5iCK8fmCURPqBKpNEyC5Ni9z+qqxpZauJJV8emxsR0i2Y/K6X+aWeIN7u3/bP 5LKHLkpzRma/mR7GnTZYrqGl61+YL37vcZTcKdJmrFOn5NVjfqEZPtaEraH7PHzV1a17 olMiF0jRLXQuGh90qgedcFrR+Y59gr7EmJulOJoRlSGuCZEbJagsw36K0Zwc2gX56T6e /iLLmUsibeFOiAZNNFx6/CYayr2ORoVEVnY98Ycx56j+/BQL44ZmNwfs3HyDAEEbOcvm iS4m/U8PjmLcVNf4GxJuU5wKYdTopFdX7QZd0i+xjOhu1ytwp8jQWJ7djkq9HZzK/gx1 pHEg== X-Received: by 10.13.226.13 with SMTP id l13mr80510669ywe.246.1452199927401; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:52:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.87.130 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:52:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.87.130 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:52:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871t9ttb22.fsf@gmx.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: baCAuuBpcmkOBk9V1pJPwB3Z5UU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197757 Archived-At: --001a114fbcbed0d3e30528c4a40c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jan 7, 2016 6:00 PM, "Michael Albinus" wrote: > > Your propasal would mean to write an own expansion mechanism, instead of > using AC_SUBST. I see. That would be quite a bit of trouble indeed. I'll ponder on this a bit more. --001a114fbcbed0d3e30528c4a40c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

On Jan 7, 2016 6:00 PM, "Michael Albinus" <michael.albinus@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Your propasal would mean to write an own expansion mechanism, instead of
> using AC_SUBST.

I see. That would be quite a bit of trouble indeed.

I'll ponder on this a bit more.

--001a114fbcbed0d3e30528c4a40c--