From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questions about isearch Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:31:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83lh9lx6oi.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8q1x1cn.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9k74pkw.fsf@gmail.com> <83bnafse4f.fsf@gnu.org> <878u5jrvih.fsf@rub.de> <87mvtyqzyx.fsf@mbork.pl> <831tbaqwwv.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2p2p4ob.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8pyow7z.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a8f5cfadd8005259e050a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448735541 26811 80.91.229.3 (28 Nov 2015 18:32:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 19:32:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2kI9-0004An-NN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 19:32:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2kIC-000823-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 13:32:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2kHy-000813-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 13:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2kHx-0002eX-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 13:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]:36735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2kHw-0002e1-34; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 13:32:00 -0500 Original-Received: by lfs39 with SMTP id 39so154666878lfs.3; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:31:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CmHHr6F1alQDEf+1JV33nnbG9wu1No/RRYypd4H45HU=; b=me6SvZ7J0ipO0H0rmZ0ffJuY5cxF1ej0iH+XVszam/oHAbOHVvVees91/pNhdasrBM ZeEa3vi95hnvYQKyK4st22ulQPIMeoocTyyZy/Uf43z8dsAM0O1Go7FbCioJd56m/T28 mikK6xVJXuPM471GVCWWj6Grqrm0I17Q1LP2tFOtSUlQHTf2rYbY5XFY9JWSFmZPdP+M MOfFz0Nra32RE+5ZFb+PVNGffqSx5KkgZdvjlpOqEfe1g4xV5Cd7q/nmxlFYzpxBGtja jeK9rDSSI4Y62qONUEE9N9Xb4HEWiRj+/KRKzxgvJu8nlvgRv8nltM2BZImXIYNbqdVH kOCQ== X-Received: by 10.112.147.9 with SMTP id tg9mr9477783lbb.38.1448735518937; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:31:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:31:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83a8pyow7z.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: DZ0VJZaA0rR1mnY18lN8HT6wYto X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195470 Archived-At: --047d7b3a8f5cfadd8005259e050a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 28 Nov 2015 5:44 pm, "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: > Two of the tests are failing for me: > > Test character-fold--test-consistency condition: > (invalid-regexp "Regular expression too big") > FAILED 1/4 character-fold--test-consistency > passed 2/4 character-fold--test-fold-to-regexp > Test character-fold--test-lax-whitespace condition: > (invalid-regexp "Regular expression too big") > FAILED 3/4 character-fold--test-lax-whitespace > passed 4/4 character-fold--test-some-defaults > > Let me know if I can provide more information. Yes, I was getting this too. I reduced the length of the random strings in the test from 100 to 50 in order to stop getting this. But it looks like your system wants it to be even lower. Can you try reducing it a bit more? Sadly, if you're forced to make it too small, then we'll have to think of another way to handle this. --047d7b3a8f5cfadd8005259e050a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 28 Nov 2015 5:44 pm, "Eli Zaretskii= " <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> Two of the tests are failing for me:
>
> =C2=A0 Test character-fold--test-consistency condition:
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (invalid-regexp "Regular expression too big&= quot;)
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0FAILED=C2=A0 1/4=C2=A0 character-fold--test-consis= tency
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0passed=C2=A0 2/4=C2=A0 character-fold--test-fold-t= o-regexp
> =C2=A0 Test character-fold--test-lax-whitespace condition:
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (invalid-regexp "Regular expression too big&= quot;)
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0FAILED=C2=A0 3/4=C2=A0 character-fold--test-lax-wh= itespace
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0passed=C2=A0 4/4=C2=A0 character-fold--test-some-d= efaults
>
> Let me know if I can provide more information.

Yes, I was getting this too. I reduced the length of the ran= dom strings in the test from 100 to 50 in order to stop getting this. But i= t looks like your system wants it to be even lower.

Can you try reduc= ing it a bit more?

Sadly, if you're forced to make it too sm= all, then we'll have to think of another way to handle this.

--047d7b3a8f5cfadd8005259e050a--