From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding async package to GNU ELPA Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:18:48 -0200 Message-ID: References: <20151224213932.12107.84317@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <0xd1ttrmgp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871ta9ar7a.fsf@gmx.de> <87ege73o2q.fsf@gmx.de> <871ta7g77t.fsf@gnus.org> <874mf2qiv3.fsf@gmx.de> <5681C474.4030408@yandex.ru> <87wprxpq4n.fsf@gmx.de> <87h9j114ay.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <87si2kywix.fsf@gmx.de> <87io3fzkrv.fsf@gmx.de> <87k2nummb5.fsf@gmail.com> <878u49dds5.fsf@gmail.com> <87bn95ppt1.fsf@gmx.de> <87oad1n5qr.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fbcbe511f7a0528b517af X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452133141 31623 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2016 02:19:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 02:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Albinus , emacs-devel To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 03:19:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aH0AF-0005m8-6D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 03:18:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aH0AB-0001KV-94 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 21:18:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aH0A6-0001Jw-Ab for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 21:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aH0A5-0004Jq-Ik for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 21:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::229]:33104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aH0A5-0004Jm-EK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 21:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id k129so303311089yke.0 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:18:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vcMag5dE7jlsKLkncsH5byUyayjJqiCN+SqDTHHRVE4=; b=hq2rFDZsdAP2R4M3Z9QIO2EwcDdey6S8CUH0ymmSfohEByk5XwSXPvVu56mf8pYrhW dzQp0Mvo4ielXu8CjBAIpL9lgoMxX5DieiunpwJ7bsmwVfeUAuHJYox4vPyCAKad8pta 4ArTZzySXWaeHoechePAE3p4hCGKKKyFG1VjGIwZgALwD4YXdg1duM4pp7Tl/ueiLj9V 0cmNOPRshIIXBGb5D2CppeZfGmlKlYYWODVYo0I5HiNknKDe9bdINARBXAQXM2dkPXR+ +K+K7XBkieig62b1qx2tUvKNmSAQ/Ib71zqlE8SnHS45rC7cIyYMScC3/xuiasqBxax5 j+7Q== X-Received: by 10.13.226.13 with SMTP id l13mr76526682ywe.246.1452133128934; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:18:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.87.130 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:18:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.87.130 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:18:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87oad1n5qr.fsf@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: n4KDFpSceS0Yrz4DoLQXoaCVpdc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197718 Archived-At: --001a114fbcbe511f7a0528b517af Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jan 4, 2016 5:50 AM, "Thierry Volpiatto" wrote: > I don't see why ELPA shouldn't have the same features as MELPA which is > supporting very well *-pkg.el files. I never said it shouldn't. :-) It just doesn't support this ATM. Although I am hesitant to add support for a second syntax, as this kind of thing tends to add to the maintenance burden. --001a114fbcbe511f7a0528b517af Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Jan 4, 2016 5:50 AM, "Thierry Volpiatto" <thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see why ELPA shouldn't have the same features as MELPA which is
> supporting very well *-pkg.el files.

I never said it shouldn't. :-)
It just doesn't support this ATM.

Although I am hesitant to add support for a second syntax, as this kind of thing tends to add to the maintenance burden.

--001a114fbcbe511f7a0528b517af--