From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freezes and Emacs 25 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:01:18 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5625B166.3080104@dancol.org> <86zizdczhp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <871tc315y3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k2pvqg0l.fsf@gnu.org> <837fluqkd1.fsf@gnu.org> <87oaf1s82r.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r3jwdp3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h9krj27a.fsf@gmail.com> <83h9kri0m3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012289346881e705245c9160 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447354890 26640 80.91.229.3 (12 Nov 2015 19:01:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 12 20:01:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwx7e-0008E7-Ez for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:01:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49193 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwx7e-0000T2-0U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:01:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwx7a-0000Sx-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwx7Z-0004jr-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]:35910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwx7Y-0004jV-AF; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:01:20 -0500 Original-Received: by lbblt2 with SMTP id lt2so41063759lbb.3; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:01:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+RD0CErXayxeqmVELFbnBP545ufCjVhuGbsn63DutTY=; b=SMeeQnG+PtIEI+gbi0/pjgYu/6USuUh7xpKMBKzTQacMBbCBrL99yZiEF8vR00Z3eh xYX8IOWu87IiD8lRaykQyyOqB4Y1i+2SiPhK91SA/4sdBMHbdIJe4xP3PaHN8+NGwL2+ ZDLtzRMRn0wwgaENRfGFLFd6aMbxRMs1eg+vd3fO6Hd79F7goTEbOn8Dx3W/XN1fBB6k a8sajjLOdB4OEQTGaCkV9/sRuy9SnWc/OQAmrbizAy47FLlDKaxwwxNMOn0ixHHTKSwD 2oW4/We1tkPX/6s5pb8dy4uTNW/2waNm4IDwwZccbQDMEw0GUVMyoqQICxcrcCatqGqc QUsw== X-Received: by 10.112.135.233 with SMTP id pv9mr8349859lbb.42.1447354878686; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:01:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.63.70 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:01:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.63.70 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:01:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83h9kri0m3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: dQSaViNoCqZUgO9-0t02OundA74 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194273 Archived-At: --089e012289346881e705245c9160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > From: Artur Malabarba > > Even if we did postpone the feature-freeze, I'd probably still not appl= y > > the isearch patch until after that. > > Call me a buzzkill, but I actually like to know that =E2=80=9Csensitive= =E2=80=9D > > features are going to get a good amount of testing before being called > > =E2=80=9Cstable=E2=80=9D. =F0=9F=98=84 Actually, this came out a bit wrong. I meant to say "the sensitive features that I write". As in, it makes me feel safer. I didn't mean to imply that other people are doing anything wrong here. --089e012289346881e705245c9160 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> > From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com>
> > Even if we did postpone the feature-freeze, I'd probably stil= l not apply
> > the isearch patch until after that.
> > Call me a buzzkill, but I actually like to know that =E2=80=9Csen= sitive=E2=80=9D
> > features are going to get a good amount of testing before being c= alled
> > =E2=80=9Cstable=E2=80=9D. =F0=9F=98=84

Actually, this came out a bit wrong. I meant to say "th= e sensitive features that I write". As in, it makes me feel safer. I d= idn't mean to imply that other people are doing anything wrong here. --089e012289346881e705245c9160--