From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:05:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <83ziynma4s.fsf@gnu.org> <5640C6A0.5010709@yandex.ru> <83twovm9es.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36b8818a82a052423a2f5 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447110360 8522 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 23:06:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:06:00 +0000 (UTC) To: Aaron Ecay , emacs-devel , Richard Stallman , eliz@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, Stromeko@nexgo.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 00:05:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvvVa-00056R-46 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:05:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56297 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvvVZ-0000CF-Mm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvvVW-0000Bj-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:05:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvvVV-0002S7-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:05:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]:32999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvvVS-0002PR-Aq; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:05:46 -0500 Original-Received: by lbbkw15 with SMTP id kw15so104019340lbb.0; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 15:05:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z/02VLIv/btj5ZENOdPdX7veOvgusJ8jzr5ItHm0bQ0=; b=sKJ8FJuZH6mg5McuHkscIyYf8n1DSzpJgs1f2r+rGaV58kOVymzYQGsML26NGUOB6f 5ZqgGCAe9gMJcKdMU7uS340S6mZO1BNZ+pQYyyv94JuEnqUsZJueVlaqHKLERDTtiMz/ YrgFAuxeShFWhYdDp95/lJCg/3XWCR1TF5o3rXoVhdfkNBMW1h7+gbBJKGu8a/PKgPnV hys8DJX4aCL7n38Gt4LJemXiTtFyYS4M/zZTUZrqHVrMq5LTKinxgUZf4djW6HJ+aKMf xzEe3Zgx56lU6C97mwFOdXRX7cE+lGVoV7I+6eFc4eFG1tuoOmK+/k18JG6hTGOVxNsQ 29zw== X-Received: by 10.112.35.196 with SMTP id k4mr200922lbj.3.1447110345530; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 15:05:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.63.70 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:05:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.63.70 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:05:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2f7YehvYhduvJKSkBQ9gNjxQnoA X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193781 Archived-At: --001a11c36b8818a82a052423a2f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 9 Nov 2015 10:06 pm, "John Wiegley" wrote: > > >>>>> Richard Stallman writes: > > > This plan seems good, overall, But in the specific case of stream.el and > > seq.el, shouldn't they be maintained in the core? I don't see stream.el in > > the sources I fetched, but seq.el is small, in emacs-lisp, and it says > > Maintainer: emacs-devel. > > If that's the case, then yes, it should be in core. I'm personally a bit > surprised that a library of this nature is in ELPA, unless it was being > provided and actively maintained by a non-core developer. Seq.el was put on Gelpa so that it can be used by emacsen < 25. I'm very grateful for that as I use it as a dependency in quite a few of my packages already. --001a11c36b8818a82a052423a2f5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On 9 Nov 2015 10:06 pm, "John Wiegley" <jwiegley@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > This plan seems good, overall, But in the specific case of stream.el and
> > seq.el, shouldn't they be maintained in the core? I don't see stream.el in
> > the sources I fetched, but seq.el is small, in emacs-lisp, and it says
> > Maintainer: emacs-devel.
>
> If that's the case, then yes, it should be in core. I'm personally a bit
> surprised that a library of this nature is in ELPA, unless it was being
> provided and actively maintained by a non-core developer.

Seq.el was put on Gelpa so that it can be used by emacsen < 25. I'm very grateful for that as I use it as a dependency in quite a few of my packages already.

--001a11c36b8818a82a052423a2f5--