From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Manheimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: multishell Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:49:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a8om1kas.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01184aca65eb1e05288695eb X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451933398 7198 80.91.229.3 (4 Jan 2016 18:49:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 19:49:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aGACb-00009R-1c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:49:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46696 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGACa-0003Cu-Hk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:49:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGACM-0003Cb-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:49:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGACL-00077x-K0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:49:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]:36275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGACL-00077t-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:49:41 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id ba1so255314985obb.3 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:49:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9sgWtMrJegJPxtzJMwVJHbdJAtiy9qoq/6MLhrN0ZO4=; b=SK1+Dg6uLI5usbJf570s8ol+F1gr0TcrJQrT2OA6aQmUiWth6ky++BUttXE87cgcET jquha8HZSmbr5oY572KqToRYjBcP/+2u3JzjWEEoNq5QrXn/83Z5/aJ+fSsbHsVJXEed 9go+RHEoNcKwa98Zd/0YXBqwks5WLoUJZN6GDbNURqQllGoOj3jv5N0ZUHpE8gFzWNF4 YKewEAvPS2bWLoGZTtr/2j4K0UoD+c6AxxrKnzdmEiw5yfSARHdC0V1rRJ35Jx0WPloh bgUrNeRaXdXNkwn80lyUf+c+Y22F+ezTXLCvABu7YDvyBYYnTI+emC0UM15zCW15FDzc ARVw== X-Received: by 10.60.81.103 with SMTP id z7mr49252188oex.59.1451933380764; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:49:40 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.202.187.6 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:49:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197620 Archived-At: --089e01184aca65eb1e05288695eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > On Jan 4, 2016 3:07 PM, "Ken Manheimer" wrote: > > It's been helpful, though, to shake out the release format with your and > other's help - thanks for that! I hope it's not inopportune for me to defer > the actual release after getting the code situated > > I don't see any problem. The only thing that comes to mind is that, if you > don't want people to get used to the current version then you might want to > remove the package from Elpa for the moment. > I'm not sure if setting the version number to 0 will do that, or if it'll > only prevent further updates. > Ah! I didn't think it was yet released to ELPA - I don't see it in the packages list. I'm uncertain whether or not you see that it actually is release - could you let me know whether or not it is, and if it is I'll move it aside, one way or another. Ken --089e01184aca65eb1e05288695eb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 4, 2016 3:07 PM, "Ken Manheimer" <= ken.manheimer@= gmail.com> wrote:
> It's been helpful, though, to shake out the release format with yo= ur and other's help - thanks for that! I hope it's not inopportune = for me to defer the actual release after getting the code situated

I don't see any problem. The only thing that come= s to mind is that, if you don't want people to get used to the current = version then you might want to remove the package from Elpa for the moment.=
I'm not sure if setting the version number to 0 will do that, or if it&= #39;ll only prevent further updates.

Ah! I didn't think it was yet released to ELPA - I d= on't see it in the packages list. I'm uncertain whether or not you = see that it actually is release - could you let me know whether or not it i= s, and if it is I'll move it aside, one way or another.

Ken
--089e01184aca65eb1e05288695eb--