From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xue Fuqiao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Quoted lambda expressions Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:32:10 +0800 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376728335 22252 80.91.229.3 (17 Aug 2013 08:32:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:32:15 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 17 10:32:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VAbvk-0003mH-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:32:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34959 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAbvj-0003bJ-Gj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 04:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAbvg-0003bD-I2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 04:32:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAbvf-0002nr-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 04:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]:61270) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAbvf-0002nj-17 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 04:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id s9so4852317iec.34 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 01:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QYxAYMYIW14bnia3vkKCWhfrfvJDq3tVmvLALeUQEXE=; b=NK9nhW6kzHFpiOFitd8TuJF9pzIGSADtKlb6WhGPtuxTYcaznUjvMoqYPIpDQFxZBm XAicVbkOwiwuO9a9gJMy6dXUQZ6NOqrnAMmy+SgWDXJvxI99ALrQ760x5jiZo2/N61Qb +SWHIIzVVOV8uwr3OmHMFI2PpjAbkYcgoPbcqqDZApC5ajm2HVB3boockvZABP4RDiDT CEvlE7ow09RWk2TOX8uUXIn5OBXEuR9o8Y23I821LE++PKsLKFCNXbwk9rD7cO7uNty5 +C3Bc7VKQfXSA04slharf9vEACD/4viOWF1CLl0Z6TcFlc4wUPcHoUcjTjZk6XUKAhhs AdYw== X-Received: by 10.42.40.148 with SMTP id l20mr591894ice.19.1376728330208; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 01:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.43.152.207 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 01:32:10 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162837 Archived-At: Hi, AFAIK "(function (lambda ...))" and "#'(lambda ...)" are the same as "(lambda ...)", because in subr.el: (defmacro lambda (&rest cdr) [...] (list 'function (cons 'lambda cdr))) But the first two forms are used 600+ times in lisp/ and 13 times in doc/. Does it make sense to do some cleanup? (And some of them should not be changed, such as the one in "(elisp) Anonymous Functions".) -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao. http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/