From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:31:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <54C05269.7050602@dancol.org> <87oaprfa3t.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <877fwfunnz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87a91bf76y.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874mrivqu4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421937125 21955 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2015 14:32:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 22 15:32:05 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YEInk-00010a-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:32:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53517 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEInk-00023B-1N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39899) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEInd-000230-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:32:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEInZ-0003A2-Iq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:31:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]:47648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEInU-00039Q-TD; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:31:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k48so2083886wev.9; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:31:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=J1ZujWrI41Xfh8F4XQH/Ox2yuAcuXV1Z5g4BQZwNItg=; b=d6b5+Nm3R5ttQywW1KoUtFClQ4E/iK812yO2DsFV0/MFfS8oPcKftnDOp2S/UX/0dI XeeN1dRtb5ikZZurJK+AJrM/sRJRwTfAwl8IkA5sGirmGDnkyb5/XjhlgpX8dWlpYHn6 qXphZ1prHRC+pPmPVhe//yqtiH+JPfXkXAFsCoB5H7CXx/rdrNOKfmpjeKXzedfIvecU VZoiEWXtC4nojw5eNRoL4dq35yIZnT8sSTcpNokJQKqP81MjgsszZEQMQCu1jYbtzfoH xFMwUljaCEbtItXXYFNh3GLUhLXoSFt+V37FeynYWaNBxx76PANS6m5TbcLgNP9CMGNN GTDQ== X-Received: by 10.194.60.19 with SMTP id d19mr3656382wjr.48.1421937108280; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:31:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.27.137.137 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:31:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874mrivqu4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181602 Archived-At: > Footnotes: > [1] ISTM that that goes without saying, given that Lisp having data > and code representations using the same syntax is advertised as an > advantage. I don't see a problem: (list (cadr #(+ % %)) (cadr #(+ % %)) (caddr #(+ % %)) (caddr #(+ % %))) ;; => ((%) (%) (+ % %) (+ % %))