From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Nazarewicz?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp (was: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r101338: ...) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:51:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87r47bi1e5.fsf@yandex.ru> <52F96284.50507@yandex.ru> <52FAE12B.6060101@yandex.ru> <52FC3BEE.60604@yandex.ru> <52FCD2B4.5080006@yandex.ru> <52FD9F1D.50205@yandex.ru> <83mwhucg1h.fsf@gnu.org> <878ute589i.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d2iqc84m.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqgxkcr9.fsf@yandex.ru> <834n41db0d.fsf@gnu.org> <52FE2985.4070703@yandex.ru> <831tz5daes.fsf@gnu.org> <8738jlohd6.fsf@yandex.ru> <83txc1bl83.fsf@gnu.org> <5300189A.9090208@yandex.ru> <83wqgv9fbj.fsf@gnu.org> <20140216180712.236069f6@forcix.jorgenschaefer.de> <83sirj9cyp.fsf@gnu.org> <20140217203145.71a849f7@forcix.jorgenschaefer.de> <837g8t8ouc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395877910 4117 80.91.229.3 (26 Mar 2014 23:51:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jorgen Schaefer To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 27 00:52:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSxbz-0006Ov-F5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:51:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50726 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSxbw-0001Dm-0K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:51:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSxbs-00019y-RI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:51:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSxbs-0000f3-3X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:51:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]:46643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSxbq-0000eo-Mj; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id uo5so2650596pbc.38 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:51:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZyKh75BePiQckp30b3RbUIp71Gvu4Y8Eve+jMdocCBY=; b=0gN3kAvgGaqeCTXzHUo0ZggNkViB4RFdsB4gdrYxyFUmDyzgR4sW/3NFa5XNmakg6v 6lMd9liFoq5+3vMLwsPnadEMwOZuCBoOtI4yKUfM3Kdnvn9Bk8MAp3A2lCscUV/CdDrO dzoEmXKH1mWmz9zQsd4xtZD4rrqXMWed4RO7OX8ujQSBFzCt/mfndER//L0mLuyqsQqG CplkHGfpQRfSusQuMU889gXLQA241sRcPuQjExMjg2Rqzra/foFYqVG3/UI1d3GHoeUg kUPuyEYyKC/NCgGDn7vZLpXxngiI9jRAkFuNGqMF3rWdXaVTKXGALfIxBYkGjp5m95mO O8OQ== X-Received: by 10.66.122.36 with SMTP id lp4mr7970141pab.82.1395877909138; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.68.65.135 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:51:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837g8t8ouc.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: ean11zWj-TykBNDdLv9BL4rJUt4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171021 Archived-At: 2014-02-17 21:29 GMT+01:00 Eli Zaretskii : > What red tape? Emacs is about the most red-tape-less project as you > can find, as far as the procedure of admitting a patch is considered. I'm a bit late to the party, and haven't yet gone through the whole thread, but let me chip in my 2 rappens anyway. ;) What I found a bit discouraging is lack of responses to my patches. Admittedly, after re-reading etc/CONTRIBUTE I discovered I was sending them to the wrong place (emacs-devel instead of bug-gnu-emacs) but still it would be nice if someone yelled at me for using the wrong mailing list.