From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitrii Korobeinikov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Request for pointers and advice: displaying several buffers inside a single window Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 15:33:48 +0600 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="65812"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 05 11:34:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1fo-000GzT-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 11:34:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46298 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1fn-00047O-An for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 05:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1fG-0003iE-KG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 05:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1fF-0000xa-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 05:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]:39963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jL1fF-0000xE-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 05:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id s8so11610213wrt.7 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 02:34:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pJDx5IqtRN3XnUEYvl38DTM4eK8/Tmt/lBP1ZDSRgZo=; b=KMV193yZZVqVgpgKXSuKtDWfgi97eE+RnGXRjRRYgv1HMV3kzUHOrcfkx0jyXIsNFr xkwHX4QtJuxUY8RG0iVW/F6pO9QtFwqVwAQ4JSmGvYaZ6Lstl3ApGHLe0kJaXHe8Jqtt TKiX1BGcd2OyzQJwvIMsoVU6JnURbNtw/5tN/1sGJF/wFpDilbRBC7S4MlH27JXxPM1Z XF20svoNikLXVLUnovAHayscd8SERZIFqMuvHZHcJweq1ivBEpRmcbBgQQdMWlkAEXpc 9qZhMD8ujfCdVEelosxkA7R0wbYvHZnGvb5iPgSGQevmXGIoogeTz807zJfapDkENLJB 50fg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pJDx5IqtRN3XnUEYvl38DTM4eK8/Tmt/lBP1ZDSRgZo=; b=BNjMyJQfOhhjgmlZRTgC16MR6C4V2iCjQDcI2+iezciAx2hGVtvtCq2vNaBpSzR2pJ XuHpnKTfHTEIBwNXy4aIJTbF7eUM83YajnIQgmKtzFQVAJYidYzxlCXz0Tgt5DYFJ6hS sd4NikMsrDZBr+ZsrN6H5mCgfNxCkgSwORUZeS8o2Jl4Jr7QA09a/iXgKozw/6hAcr5z vDr9Y5klxHKZxzEqqMc5+my6RZNZ5wXbjCrPTSQRiU0qPLLbUFUY0GO2H+MXfskZcjnG Yj7UvmGNRMTG4sH74zmXLjTh3hLD+UnSV0h6NXyssBbYZGPIpwBc4hKMJwx88g/CV3c4 ohkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubxWZYjjqmPYOojgSMa8lIyG+u1rqBNX6POQlZ1MMlqBcQ/z11C lAROwwav3yN1mFw4TTPqAAp4PxdtxIEXKu5ILQEe9Ayr X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJsNtGOvkDUrkX1zm+T6bZB09EMrP7OOZRgnnNd+pYErRBCLE9H7q8gHPhik1he/WQF5MsTaUwgedSYqdUQZgc= X-Received: by 2002:adf:eccd:: with SMTP id s13mr209304wro.105.1586079240205; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 02:34:00 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::42e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246442 Archived-At: > This would look the same as two windows each displaying one buffer, if > you could eliminate the mode line in betweeen them. That should be much > easier. > Hmm. Currently, the bottom line in a window is only partially displayed. > So you'd also have to adjust the top window height to allow displaying > the full last line. Or not; depends on what you want. That's a viable approach for the first-stage case, though now I am thinking that since my ultimate goal is to make the buffers behave as if they were just different parts of the same buffer, tweaking buffer.c is going to be the only right way to go anyway. So gonna be trying to extend upon the gap buffer instead of the render engine.