From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Vibhav Pant Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make purecopy create hash tables properly Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:13:29 +0530 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485781484 16739 195.159.176.226 (30 Jan 2017 13:04:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 14:04:39 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYBdO-00049P-MA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:04:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60389 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYBdU-00012I-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:04:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYBIy-0000wE-Ip for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 07:43:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYBIx-0008Di-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 07:43:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yb0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::234]:33686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYBIx-0008DS-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 07:43:31 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yb0-x234.google.com with SMTP id w194so193881308ybe.0 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:43:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=21wBA2hQ5PckyE3tSe+5VsZsK9AuR9xsikCkWCoaHJA=; b=OO0PHw5dXUZaE1isGYIeMSNiuGR21AylJUClGMOU8rs6fWv8pt20AzsHjBMKqBx4I8 pbX7r4LgXa2yO3MKGBflppeE/9KWhXD2X1j1QIR4CtWxqZEHOZoBGeX8KeV2WLt4NfTM ZJJ7FCQbSj63ECVVyqujhPX6uI6qLYhVZ5WLiASRkXNpvgAwNsnlg244rkJoJWXpB00c F3L3gqAKuCac1jv8JgSRUNht9sL9QBR+fLnZEun8dlyEpA60WJHXc/mh4C9eE63h5rEI 6ny7+lBFA0CRRIz36tTFxTgh7fK3kmNn+hTzSsFc8Afh4Tn/DWNBnxQRIVUycK1K6Mgr sltg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=21wBA2hQ5PckyE3tSe+5VsZsK9AuR9xsikCkWCoaHJA=; b=G+X56wTbFwO/y6c6/wNcxQpZFOmezEwITjEcwMARRMHTlu361CbmCd+BgbIzLiQber gfe0gkgj0iITr/64HAl8D5RdU7XeLbk5oJR6ur4vZRaiA/fbLXUbEWpPErus3HvB1FlY 7mr2Sp1TZbs5TuBgOU6NRCcLrg09mE7WNu/+YkC4vErvVlvcryJUOKmFEAAfx2oLax/V GGRnrcDucqYEs2GXbeByYuDQLEFFNWvSulkYjriLSPG162tFdrDf9eJWM2+HG/6K269b iHEhcR0zsm9prFo/8TvUfbPCY/RoSCvVLQFXowFn9AXmRoQfJT3jzRluvxR70oaPIPDf 1eSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXInb3Oic0lbp2m3CDU6zPKb7fbAOYaSsvm6M1voGcUOJ0wIZbBXSs3FkfzqbLSqMqT2YnFVOliIrI11IQ== X-Received: by 10.37.197.74 with SMTP id v71mr11102472ybe.33.1485780209526; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:43:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.153.77 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:43:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c09::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211756 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > But those make pure objects "out of thin air", whereas in the present > case what we do is to copy a pre-existing Lisp_Object into pure space. > But, yes, you're right that the distinction is largely irrelevant, so > either way is fine, Ah, that makes sense. I've renamed the function accordingly and pushed the changes to master. Thanks, Vibhav -- Vibhav Pant vibhavp@gmail.com