On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pit@gmail.com
> wrote:

> On 2016-06-23 14:46, Robert Weiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Clément Pit--Claudel <
> clement.pit@gmail.com <mailto:clement.pit@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     ‘C-M-q’ (prog-indent-sexp)
> >           Indent the expression after point.
> >
> > One small formatting suggestion is to surround the key sequences
> > with curly braces, {C-M-q}.
>


> Thanks! Isn't the convention to surround them in `single quotes' (which
> get translated into ‘curly quotes’), though?
>

​I just find that quotes are not unique enough and do not set off key
bindings from other quoted items well.  Curly braces seem to do a better
job, that is all.
​


> By invoke the keybinding, do you mean browse to the source, or run the
> associated command? The latter would be undesirable, since most of these
> commands are going to be context-sensitive.
>

​You could make them do whatever you want.  The default is to invoke the
key binding when one mouse button is pressed (shift-mouse2) and to show the
key binding's full documentation ​when shift-mouse3 is pressed.  If a key
binding is not useful within the current buffer, simply don't select it for
execution.

And I like your idea.  You could also consider the formatting and
hyperlinking from M-x apropos as a reference point.

Bob