From: Robert Weiner <rsw@gnu.org>
To: emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Emacs 25.0.04: Feature Request: Make called-interactively-p's argument optional
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:35:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+OMD9iQ_x71J5zcjO8gOJK57yC20itvw05o9W30RZ5RqSiK9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 633 bytes --]
I have some older code with a lot of calls to (interactive-p) for which
I am having to substitute (called-interactively-p 'interactive) to get the
same behavior with a non-obsoleted call. Visually, this does not read well
to me and I imagine others. What do people think of making the argument
optional and defaulting it to the behavior of (interactive-p) which I
believe equates to the 'interactive argument value?
Then we would have: if (called-interactively-p) ...) in a lot of places and
that would look much better and be much easier to call properly.
When more complex behavior is needed, the argument could be given.
Bob
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1331 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-27 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-27 20:35 Robert Weiner [this message]
2016-06-28 19:09 ` Emacs 25.0.04: Feature Request: Make called-interactively-p's argument optional John Wiegley
2016-06-28 20:28 ` Robert Weiner
2016-06-30 16:54 ` Andreas Röhler
2016-06-28 20:29 ` Glenn Morris
2016-06-28 20:46 ` Robert Weiner
2016-06-28 20:51 ` Robert Weiner
2016-06-29 20:02 ` Richard Stallman
2016-06-29 20:54 ` Robert Weiner
2016-06-29 21:19 ` Drew Adams
2016-06-29 21:39 ` Robert Weiner
2016-06-29 21:48 ` Robert Weiner
2016-06-30 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2016-06-29 21:21 ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2016-06-29 21:52 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-06-29 22:00 ` Robert Weiner
2016-06-30 2:51 ` raman
2016-06-30 14:25 ` Robert Weiner
2016-06-30 15:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-03 18:36 ` Andreas Röhler
2016-07-03 18:56 ` Alan Mackenzie
2016-07-03 19:57 ` Andreas Röhler
2016-07-03 19:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-06-30 15:34 ` raman
2016-07-03 0:10 ` Richard Stallman
2016-07-06 0:09 ` John Wiegley
2016-07-06 0:21 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-07-06 0:31 ` John Wiegley
2016-07-06 1:46 ` raman
2016-07-06 2:05 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-07-06 14:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-06 15:14 ` raman
2016-07-06 14:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-06 15:20 ` Robert Weiner
2016-07-06 0:24 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-07-06 5:03 ` Robert Weiner
2016-07-06 6:45 ` Andreas Röhler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+OMD9iQ_x71J5zcjO8gOJK57yC20itvw05o9W30RZ5RqSiK9g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rsw@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rswgnu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).