From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master b72f885: Make dlet work like let, not let* Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:46:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83wnp5m9i5.fsf@gnu.org> <9DE2F5D1-A89A-4357-9E46-268F697D8260@acm.org> <837dh2mz57.fsf@gnu.org> <74C5058D-AF5C-4F1A-8D08-251935A69693@acm.org> <831r7amsef.fsf@gnu.org> <83y29il8nx.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnp1laau.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtpxjvc0.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24525"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 04 13:47:30 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBFMv-0006BQ-Rz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:47:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBFMu-0007j0-B9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 07:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBFLg-0006xE-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 07:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail70c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.80]:38726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBFLe-0006lz-4T; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 07:46:12 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1628077565; bh=Iw49Jh/ZEUmz4zlc4CUK3O/lOX3ZX4N7TjLes7To2o0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=OFWw273iTpJofP4O32QlnuCt9G9zfjXiSEdSBc8JvZ2H409wfmep1D4tPwMsgsJDd Vfktev4DnZ//D9+FehE4+88/R5F2laoKf7effWoJTyPrA7H+Q/p7I9eZ9triCrWdyH TVfFz29oCfiecHj6phURli5IwZU9y0uoa+WiZzrI= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c188-150-171-71.bredband.tele2.se [188.150.171.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail70c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 174Bk2R4023140; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:46:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87mtpxjvc0.fsf@gnus.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F28.610A7DFD.001F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=G/ti7Os5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:117 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=OocQHUDgAAAA:8 a=11bQyg_vt-5dFxISOP8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=xUZTl98r3Qw_uB5NK3jt:22 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.10.80; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail70c50.megamailservers.eu X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272034 Archived-At: 4 aug. 2021 kl. 13.35 skrev Lars Ingebrigtsen : > if we're > calling this dlet* to have a consistent naming scheme for all let > macros, that ship sailed a long time ago when `when-let' was added > (which has more let*-ish semantics). That's a good point, although with the counterpoint that we shouldn't = let past mistakes prevent us from doing the right thing in the future.