Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar

[Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>]

> On Dec 25, 2024, at 6:23 PM, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
> Hi Yuan,
> 
> On 25/12/2024 10:39, Yuan Fu wrote:
>>> Hopefully we manage to convey well that the "last tested version" is not necessarily the latest that will work, just the one that we tested.
>> Right now the comment says this at the end:
>> ;; We try our best to make builtin modes work with latest grammar
>> ;; versions, so a more recent grammar version has a good chance to work.
>> ;; Send us a bug report if it doesn't.
>> But let me know if it can be improved in some way.
> 
> Just a nit, but we could add "too" at the end:
> 
>  so a more recent grammar has a good chance to work too.
> 
> (I removed the word "version" for easier refilling, but that's definitely not neccesary.)
> 
> About the paragraph before, just a thought but do we want to use a standard phrase like "has been tested":
> 
>  ;; c-ts-mode has been tested with the following languages and version:
> 
> ? Seems a bit more regular for a casual reader, which conveying the same meaning. I'm not a native speaker, though.

Thanks, I applied these changes. Next time we run the scripts they’ll take effect.

Yuan