From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: walk-windows Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:46:12 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1184523029 13397 80.91.229.12 (15 Jul 2007 18:10:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:10:29 +0000 (UTC) To: "Emacs-Devel" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 15 20:10:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IA8Y4-0004E8-Mi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:10:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IA8Xs-0005bp-4R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IA8Xo-0005Zd-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IA8Xj-0005V4-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IA8Xj-0005V1-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IA8XW-0002a6-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id l6FI8DJ3025143 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:08:13 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt351.oracle.com (acsmt351.oracle.com [141.146.40.151]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id l6E9FWaD030219 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:08:12 -0600 Original-Received: from dhcp-amer-csvpn-gw2-141-144-73-5.vpn.oracle.com by acsmt350.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3041303651184521584; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:46:24 -0700 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74837 Archived-At: > Can someone please explain a little about the logic behind the > treatment of a standalone minibuffer frame in `walk-windows' > (hence also `count-windows')? ... > The first two sentences in the third paragraph seem to conflict.... > Which is correct? This is important, because it determines the > meaning of `all-frames' when it is nil, because the doc string > says, about that, "the frames as specified above". > > Beyond this confusion, I don't understand why you would want to > include windows on another frame, if all-frames is nil. Can anyone help here? See original post for more info.