From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: isearch multiple buffers Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:22:08 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87fxzwgjs0.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193541755 20154 80.91.229.12 (28 Oct 2007 03:22:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juri Linkov" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 28 04:22:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IlyjS-0005iz-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:22:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlyjJ-00051P-Pq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IlyjG-00051K-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:22:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IlyjE-000518-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlyjE-000515-08 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ilyj9-0002xT-F1; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:22:15 -0400 Original-Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id l9S3MCGd001626; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:22:12 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt351.oracle.com (acsmt351.oracle.com [141.146.40.151]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id l9S3BdVG032069; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:22:12 -0600 Original-Received: from dhcp-amer-csvpn-gw1-141-144-64-37.vpn.oracle.com by acsmt350.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3325019731193541704; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:21:44 -0700 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <87fxzwgjs0.fsf@jurta.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81916 Archived-At: > Using a dedicated mark requires creating a new keybinding and a new mark > to be able to mark with a dedicated mark. Wouldn't it be simple just have > a dedicated key to start isearch on normal marks? OK by me. Another choice point: If there are marks in both Dired and Buffer List, should the same key search all of them? Likewise, for marks in multiple Dired buffers. I think so, but there might be a reason to treat Dired marks and Buffer List marks separately (?). And if marks in multiple buffers are treated together (same key), and we provide for a way to order the marks in a given buffer, what is the overall order among the marks in the various Dired buffers and Buffer List?