From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toru TSUNEYOSHI Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: linum.el: problem (bug ?) fix and improvement Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:55:04 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305302237 27453 80.91.229.12 (13 May 2011 15:57:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 13 17:57:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKujj-0000vT-T6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:57:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40125 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKujj-00045d-CU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKujg-00044t-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKuje-00009e-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from blu0-omc4-s26.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.111.165]:38216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKuje-00009a-Ri for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from BLU0-SMTP204 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s26.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 13 May 2011 08:57:02 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [210.253.252.244] X-Originating-Email: [t_tuneyosi@hotmail.com] Original-Received: from localhost ([210.253.252.244]) by BLU0-SMTP204.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 13 May 2011 08:57:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3.50 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 May 2011 15:57:01.0097 (UTC) FILETIME=[655FD190:01CC1186] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-Received-From: 65.55.111.165 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139361 Archived-At: From: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: linum.el: problem (bug ?) fix and improvement Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:15:45 -0300 Message-ID: >> I have a case that I make unimportant text invisible temporarily, to >> know only important information. > > Any reason why you don't use the ellipsis (see buffer-invisibility-spec)? > > > Stefan > I can't check the ellipsis easily, if `truncate-lines' is non-nil and the ellipsis text is truncated. (In this case, I must scroll the window horizontally many times.) If linum-mode provides information about the invisible text, I can check the information very easily, I think.