Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar

[Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>]

> On Jan 3, 2025, at 4:26 AM, Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver@mavit.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025, Peter Oliver wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024, Yuan Fu wrote:
>> 
>>> Anyway, as a first step, I added a command that generates a html file that
>>> looks like the below. I’ll try setting up a cron job on my machine, then
>>> we can figure out how do we run it on EMBA and how to host the generated
>>> webpage.
>>> 
>>> Peter, do you have any suggestions after seeing this example webpage?
>> 
>> Looks good.
>> 
>> Rather than the latest commit, I’d be more interested in the latest release (i.e., commit tagged with a tag starting “v”).  I’d only consider packaging a Git snapshot as a last resort to solve an important bug, so tagged commits are more relevant to me.
> 
> So, then, something along the lines of the attached (although, actually, maybe we want both?).
> 
> -- 
> Peter Oliver<0001-New-function-treesit-language-git-version-tags.patch><0002-Tweak-Tree-sitter-compatibility-report-to-show-only-.patch>

Thanks! What you showed looks good. And yeah, we should have both “last tag” and “last commit”. “Last commit” would be useful for people that install tree-sitter grammars with download scripts.

Let me see how can I construct the table to show both.

Yuan