From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Hl-line and visual-line Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 10:22:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <45790724-63FC-4B80-A70D-8CD49A92FEE3@gmail.com> <8339xmqob9.fsf@gnu.org> <94F28B33-A04E-4511-B93D-E5471EE4D0DE@gmail.com> <201005210834.28589.tassilo@member.fsf.org> <83wruxpt2z.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274451836 349 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2010 14:23:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 14:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 21 16:23:54 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFT8k-0007HL-5i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 16:23:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFT8j-0002YJ-AG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 10:23:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58395 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFT7O-0001Vq-9G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 10:22:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFT7N-00013u-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 10:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f191.google.com ([209.85.221.191]:46217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFT7J-00013G-Ab; Fri, 21 May 2010 10:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so840971qyk.14 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:22:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Z2RGOajtuSfFkvrkYRSxtrQ1VJ3EU41O/S2kCDhpjIw=; b=Op5sCtOk9g07QeRsJFvDO+hx1jAuT6GLgcEK84qlNhQCzbC1VPR4qXhc9f2tY4wWQ2 YLe1WO48rU/kYVjWR3S7W5SmAfucPsWE+CdTGafqEl1CMzJc+wqBSyUbUNNO97QGY9KH N+u4XfissW0hEmO977ZFKNuavy/az5iyLXdIk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=DK8wJs9LmvZg5jdFvFwyfOmRTFuK/0RESgloe0HGnp6XEHJCM+1Zd5QoWdgf7bpfbO PktrifDaB+nbd5Hx+kQkfI06xqOwzWWnwj99fLYAEXX5U1wQCz0d//tg6Fgc6Qdq78Lp 9mvkFakphmzXCPJGuHgM9xR2ikWa/xSzXIPCs= Original-Received: by 10.224.53.91 with SMTP id l27mr1143092qag.352.1274451744700; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:22:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.17] (pool-96-235-7-98.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [96.235.7.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm619851qyk.0.2010.05.21.07.22.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 May 2010 07:22:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83wruxpt2z.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124992 Archived-At: On May 21, 2010, at 4:17 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > Fixing that would mean introducing some feature that will allow you to > request that an overlay's priority is below text properties. That > sounds like a simpler change (we have negative priority values vacant > for that, I think) than pushing line highlight to the level of the > basic redisplay. The latter would have significant effect on the > structure of the display code, just like region highlight does. And > the display engine code is already too complex, to the degree that is > almost unmaintainable. Well, for that reason my thinking was along the lines of reducing line = highlight functionality to changing the background color only, or = something like that, but perhaps some users might prefer a larger or = bold font (e.g. when you can't see well). So yes, let's either fix beginning/end-of-visual-line, or provide a = function that does the right thing, and base hl-line on that (in = visual-line-mode).=