From: Herbert Euler <herberteuler@hotmail.com>
To: <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Two problems of completion
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:57:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY143-W271E6DA6CB49DBBE037031DAD80@phx.gbl> (raw)
Currently SPC is bound to minibuffer-complete-word in minibuffer.
With partial completion facilities implemented for minibuffer, I don't
know whether it is still right to bind SPC to this command, but if so
I find two problems.
1. Special case: the string before completion is the empty string "".
In this case, completion--try-word-completion will see a completion
available, i.e. ("" . 0), and then try firstly completing with " " (""
+ " ") and then "-" ("" + "-"). Partial completion often (e.g. in a
command execution context, i.e. typing M-x then typing SPC) returns a
result of ("-" . 0), make a completion available.
I think when the user press SPC directly in such a case, it means that
the user wants to see a list of available completions, instead of
wanting a partially completed word. So this case might need special
handling.
2. Minibuffer content rewriting.
The current minibuffer content rewriting facility in
completion--do-completion seems not for partial completion. Partial
completion normally returns 0 as completion point, e.g. ("org--" . 0),
so a rewriting may look like this (`|' means the position of cursor):
M-x org-|
(typing SPC)
M-x |org--
(typing SPC again, a surprising result from an attempt of completing
an empty string):
M-x -org-|-
Something is apparently wrong.
Regards,
Guanpeng Xu
_________________________________________________________________
Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy!
http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-30 2:57 Herbert Euler [this message]
2008-04-30 3:47 ` Two problems of completion Stefan Monnier
2008-04-30 22:01 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-05-23 15:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-05-23 16:12 ` Herbert Euler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY143-W271E6DA6CB49DBBE037031DAD80@phx.gbl \
--to=herberteuler@hotmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).