From: "Herbert Euler" <herberteuler@hotmail.com>
Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:07:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY112-F64A61114D57DF5F258E64DAC50@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85y7y2ih5u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
>From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
>To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
>CC: rms@gnu.org, herberteuler@hotmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>Subject: Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
>Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:43:25 +0200
>
>And of course, consistency would do no harm. I have not sampled other
>limits, whether system-imposed or user-modifiable, so I can't vouch
>whether one or the other name seems more in line with other usage.
Maybe it's stupid: Is it possible to let the Lisp debugger register some
variable so that once the Lisp interpreter see debugger has finished
and 'max-specpdl-size' is different from what user set it will set 'max-
specpdl-size' back, to keep the consistency of other applications of
the term 'max'? (I think 'max' in other applications, at least in most
other applications, is inherent.)
Regards,
Guanpeng Xu
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-19 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-16 7:59 Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter? Herbert Euler
2006-04-17 2:40 ` Herbert Euler
2006-04-17 9:06 ` Romain Francoise
2006-04-18 1:41 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-18 3:20 ` Herbert Euler
2006-04-18 6:36 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-18 14:07 ` Herbert Euler
2006-04-18 11:25 ` Juanma Barranquero
2006-04-18 20:50 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-19 1:43 ` Herbert Euler
2006-04-17 17:56 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-18 2:18 ` Herbert Euler
2006-04-18 2:22 ` Miles Bader
2006-04-18 5:44 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-18 20:50 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-18 23:34 ` Miles Bader
2006-04-18 23:43 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-19 3:07 ` Herbert Euler [this message]
2006-04-19 15:40 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-19 2:59 ` Herbert Euler
2006-04-19 3:47 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-19 4:03 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-19 5:11 ` Herbert Euler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-18 13:51 Herbert Euler
2006-04-15 8:24 Herbert Euler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY112-F64A61114D57DF5F258E64DAC50@phx.gbl \
--to=herberteuler@hotmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).