From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't use revision numbers on commit messages (and elsewhere). Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:36:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877hbfvwyo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87tyeivni1.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k4fevkc1.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87zko6rn8y.fsf@thysbe.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301953525 23619 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2011 21:45:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nils Ackermann , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 23:45:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6raK-0006hR-0D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:45:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50260 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6rS4-0005SU-9z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:36:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38214 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6rRy-0005Pk-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:36:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6rRx-0002ac-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:36:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:46556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6rRx-0002aA-Gj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:36:41 -0400 Original-Received: by eyd9 with SMTP id 9so1877863eyd.0 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XXhO5WbnEWe/r+mWETf+x8cjz2nIFmtjcEly06xIZS0=; b=erDZg7Keeety8aaGR9TNO3ULLCH4mI1U4WsLPAbTkqyohOqd4+oSYIjMh2zWV99Q5j 2FPMkwzadINIdXIuMz24z4WLlTm5SbN2HQ8/ynE43ECsdGcmPzzgJsHqyilsDbWAPFcM WWZiqGNYLxor5vCP0lCrGRYd4m2ihtBqPCi3I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tFMpYqQjIddOUw/baYvNBfTOynW9f21frN2FLbTsriRYC8ovbnG0FC93SLvCwQd4+6 0xiJagejlIXbzb7g2KIYSw3LK1HYvoNBsjnesvigLJIz5WIu5c8rFZQBI7h9yy1qVL3M dyMBPvFC4nzwhgdEtfK+AJ4n5Ajy3JosZzO50= Original-Received: by 10.213.15.141 with SMTP id k13mr1854436eba.144.1301953000141; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.33.200 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138148 Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrot= e: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 18:32, Nils Ackermann = wrote: > >> As recently as a >> year ago there was a discussion on new ideas for calculating revision >> numbers: > > I'll be happy to switch to using revids as soon as they give the users > more convenient way to handle them. =C2=A0The current schema of > email-yyyymmddhhmmss-randomshit does not give itself easily to > abbreviation. In what way is it difficult to handle the current schema? (I guess you never type the revid?)